Skully Founders Allegedly Used Funding As "Personal Piggy Banks"

Via skully.com

Earlier this week, Skully, a promising San Francisco-based startup that claimed to build a better motorcycle helmet using augmented reality, informed customers that it was shutting down and filing for bankruptcy. According to TechCrunch, the closure came a couple weeks after the board of directors forced out Marcus and Mitch Weller, the brothers who cofounded Skully. A newly discovered lawsuit filed by the brothers&; assistant may fill in some of the gaps.

The complaint alleges that the Wellers used Skully “as a tool to pay their personal expenses” and abused the company “in such a fraudulent manner it rendered the corporate entity a sham.”

The lawsuit was filled late last month by Isabelle Faithauer, who describes herself as an assistant to the brothers; her responsibilities included “managing the books of Skully,” under the Wellers&039; supervision. (Faithauer&039;s LinkedIn profile describes her as the executive assistant to the CEO, Marcus Weller.)

Her complaint alleges that the Wellers “routinely demanded that Plaintiff engage in fraudulent bookkeeping practices designed to defraud investors,” all while allegedly refusing to pay overtime or give her meal and rest breaks stipulated by California law.

Faithauer lists some of the alleged fraudulent bookkeeping that she was “required to generate, over her strong objections, in order to keep her job,” including:

  • Rent for the brothers&039; personal apartments in the Marina
  • Security deposits for an apartment in Dogpatch used by the Wellers
  • Weekly apartment cleanings
  • Personal grocery bills for the Wellers
  • All restaurant meals for the brothers
  • Mitchell Weller&039;s Dodge Viper, which was claimed for insurance following an accident, as well as the new Viper purchased by the company to replace it

Skully raised nearly $2.5 million in crowdfunding from IndieGogo in order to build helmets with a heads-up display, and claimed to raise an additional $11 million in subsequent rounds of venture financing.

None of Skully’s IndieGogo backers have received their helmets. TechCrunch, which obtained a copy of Skully&039;s letter to customers, reported that filing for bankruptcy means that customers “likely won’t be getting a refund on pre-orders for the $1,500 AR helmet Skully was working on.”

BuzzFeed News contacted the Wellers for comment, but we haven&039;t heard back.

This story is developing and we will update the post as we learn more.

See a copy of the lawsuit here:

Quelle: <a href="Skully Founders Allegedly Used Funding As "Personal Piggy Banks"“>BuzzFeed

Public vs private? Hybrid gives the biggest gains

Want to hear about the best examples of enterprise computing today? At Open Stack Silicon Valley, August 9-10 you will hear about some of the most innovative implementations in the market and what you will find is that the majority are not purely in the public cloud, nor are they solely in the data center. Enterprises today are getting the most benefit when they take advantage of both, and use the hybrid model of .

Why? Because using this “blended” model lets you stop worrying about where your apps are, and focus more on how to leverage the right resources for the right value that helps you deliver innovation and create new value streams for your business. According to IDC, eighty-two percent of you already have a hybrid cloud strategy — but are you utilizing the mix of resources for maximum gains?

Despite what other cloud market leaders might tell you, hybrid is not a temporary state but the new normal and the normal for decades to come. That’s because compute and data are everywhere and being generated everywhere. And if you want to deliver greater business value you need to embrace and leverage this breadth. In my session at Open Stack Silicon Valley, on August 10 at 10:00 am PDT, I’ll take you through why leading organizations are thinking hybrid now and for the future. The catalyst for this thinking isn’t infrastructure ownership, control or security. It’s what’s right for the apps.

Want global reach, massive elastic scale, and a wealth of innovative compute and data services? Use the public cloud: that’s what it was designed for!

Perhaps you have a factory automation solution, point-of-sale system, or a legacy application that you’d just as soon keep in your data center for now. If there’s a good reason not to move to the cloud, you shouldn’t – but think about connecting those apps to cloud-based, agile and highly scalable business workflows, mobile customer experiences, IoT initiatives and other innovations that help drive your business values forward.

For example, Microsoft and GE recently announced a partnership where GE’s vast base of industrial computing capabilities will connect to its Predix analytics service running in Azure. “Connecting industrial machines to the internet through the cloud is a huge step toward simplifying business processes and reimagining how work gets done,” said Jeff Immelt, CEO of GE. You can’t move the industrial machines to the cloud, obviously, but offloading all the analytics from the data center to the cloud makes great technical and economic sense.

Want to connect on-premises and cloud apps securely so that you have one consistently managed “virtual” data center?

With Azure virtual networking, or Express Route, our dedicated-line solution, you can connect securely and get the bandwidth you need. With Microsoft’s Operations Management Suite, you can have a “single pane of glass” for managing workloads across OpenStack, public Azure, AWS and other deployments.

Here’s what Michael Alatortsev, chief executive officer at iTrend, a provider of data discovery services, said about their hybrid application: “A Microsoft hybrid cloud solution with … Azure enabled us to make more flexible design decisions.” He added, “We can adapt our solution to address different market verticals and situations, and creating a new type of report is very easy.”

Today, using Infrastructure-as-a-Service, you can easily migrate VM’s from your data center to the cloud. With SQL Server, you can keep your database local, shift to a blended deployment using SQL Server 2016, or trivially move it to Azure – as mobile application provider App Dynamic did: “The transition of [the on-premises] database to … Azure SQL Database only took a few hours,” said Pratik Kumar, CEO and founder of App Dynamic.

Microsoft offers the most comprehensive suite of offerings for the hybrid cloud, from networking and directory services to application services like SQL Server and big data, backup and recovery, and our Office and Dynamics offerings, all of which can run either on-premises or in the cloud, and can easily connect to other applications running in either location. No other vendor provides such a rich hybrid portfolio, and why? Because we’ve been providing enterprise-grade technologies to our customers for years and we understand your needs.

At the end of the day, it’s not about where your computing assets are, it’s how they provide value to your business! Think of the cloud as a new opportunity – not an obligation – for you to drive breakthrough levels of value from your computing assets, and design your hybrid cloud for the maximum business value.

Have questions about this premise? Want to hear more about how to implement this strategy at your organization? Join me at Open Stack Silicon Valley on August 10. Already executing on a successful hybrid app strategy? Tell us about it in the comments section below. Let’s get you on stage at next year’s show.
Quelle: Azure

Making operating systems safer and faster with ‘unikernels’

Specialised computer software components to improve the security, speed and scale of data processing in are being developed by a University of Cambridge spin-out company. The company, Unikernel Systems, which was formed by staff and postdoctoral researchers at the University Computer Laboratory, has recently been acquired by San-Francisco based software company Docker Inc.

Unikernels are small, potentially transient computer modules specialised to undertake a single task at the point in time when it is needed. Because of their reduced size, they are far more secure than traditional operating systems, and can be started up and shut down quickly and cheaply, providing flexibility and further security.

They are likely to become increasingly used in applications where security and efficiency are vital, such as systems storing personal data and applications for the so-called Internet of Things (IoT) – internet-connected appliances and consumer products.

“Unikernels provide the means to run the same application code on radically different environments from the public cloud to IoT devices,” said Dr Richard Mortier of the Computer Laboratory, one of the company’s advisors. “This allows decisions about where to run things to be revisited in the light of experience – providing greater flexibility and resilience. It also means software on those IoT devices is going to be a lot more reliable.”

Recent years have seen a huge increase in the amount of data that is collected, stored and processed, a trend that will only continue as increasing numbers of devices are connected to the internet. Most commercial data storage and processing now takes place within huge datacentres run by specialist providers, rather than on individual machines and company servers; the individual elements of this system are obscured to end users within the ‘cloud’. One of the technologies that has been instrumental in making this happen is virtual machines.

Normally, a virtual machine (VM) runs just like a real computer, with its own virtual operating system – just as your desktop computer might run Windows. However, a single real machine can run many VMs concurrently. VMs are general purpose, able to handle a wide range of jobs from different types of user, and capable of being moved across real machines within datacentres in response to overall user demand. The University’s Computer Laboratory started research on virtualisation in 1999, and the Xen virtual machine monitor that resulted now provides the basis for much of the present-day cloud.

Although VMs have driven the development of the cloud (and greatly reduced energy consumption), their inherent flexibility can come at a cost if their virtual operating systems are the generic Linux or Windows systems. These operating systems are large and complex, they have significant memory footprints, and they take time to start up each time they are required. Security is also an issue, because of their relatively large ‘attack surface’.

Given that many VMs are actually used to undertake a single function, (e.g. acting as a company database), recent research has shifted to minimising complexity and improving security by taking advantage of the narrow functionality. And this is where unikernels come in.

Researchers at the Computer Laboratory started restructuring VMs into flexible modular components in 2009, as part of the RCUK-funded MirageOS project. These specialised modules – or unikernels – are in effect the opposite of generic VMs. Each one is designed to undertake a single task; they are small, simple and quick, using just enough code to enable the relevant application or process to run (about 4% of a traditional operating system according to one estimate).

The small size of unikernels also lends considerable security advantages, as they present a much smaller ‘surface’ to malicious attack, and also enable companies to separate out different data processing tasks in order to limit the effects of any security breach that does occur. Given that resource use within the cloud is metered and charged, they also provide considerable cost savings to end users.

By the end of last year, the unikernel technology arising from MirageOS was sufficiently advanced that the team, led by Dr. Anil Madhavapeddy, decided to found a start-up company. The company, Unikernel Systems, was recently acquired by San Francisco-based Docker Inc. to accelerate the development and broad adoption of the technology, now envisaged as a critical element in the future of the Internet of Things.

“This brings together one of the most significant developments in operating systems technology of recent years, with one of the most dynamic startups that has already revolutionised the way we use cloud computing. This link-up will truly allow us all to “rethink cloud infrastructure”, said Balraj Singh, co-founder and CEO of Unikernel Systems.

“This acquisition shows that the Computer Laboratory continues to produce innovations that find their way into mainstream developments. It also shows the power of open source development to have impact and to be commercially successful”, said Professor Andy Hopper, Head of the University of Cambridge Computer Laboratory.
Technology to improve the security, speed and scale of data processing in age of the Internet of Things is being developed by a Cambridge spin-out company.
This acquisition shows the power of open source development to have impact and to be commercially successful.Andy Hopper
The text in this work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. For image use please see separate credits above.
Yes
Quelle: University of Cambridge

Unexpected continuous location tracking/energy change in android?

So this is really weird, but I have found what seems to be unexpected continuous location tracking that is causing noticeable battery drain on Android 6.0. Right now, it&;s looking like a change in an automatically updated component, so it is probably due to a closed source service or app. So this is in the style of the work from Vern Paxson&8217;s group on characterizing the observed behavior of third party software.
Has anybody else running Android 6.0 noticed a particularly large increase in power drain, with the GPS icon displayed continuously? I will be running additional tests in the coming days, but wanted to report the unusual behavior and see if other researchers have noticed it as well, or want to investigate it while it lasts.
Background

I&8217;ve been doing power profiling of power drain under various regimes as part of understanding the power/accuracy tradeoffs for my travel pattern tracking project. So I basically install apps with different data collection regimes on multiple test phones of the same make, model and OS version, and carry all of them around for comparison.

From last Thu/Fri/Sat, it looks like the power drain behavior on android has changed dramatically. In particular, it looks like some system component has GPS location turned on continuously, and is draining the battery quite dramatically. See details below.
This is a Nexus 6 running a stock android kernel (v 6.0.1, patch level: March 1, 2016), with no non-OEM apps installed other than mine, and with google maps location history turned off, so this must be due to unexpected background access by either the OS or some stock google app. And since I didn&8217;t update the OS, my guess is that it is a closed source component such as google play services or google maps that is automatically updated/patched.
Details
Here are the graphs for power drain on Sat v/s Tue v/s Thu v/s Fri. I think that the change happened sometime during the day on Thursday, because I know that the GPS icon was off on phones 2 and 4 on Thursday morning and was displayed on Thursday night. It was gone again when I rebooted on Thu, but came back again sometime on Friday. Has been on ever since then, even after rebooting.

Battery levels when tracking was off on the same phone (note the higher drain on Thu and the big change on Fri + Sat)

 Before we compare levels across phones, we need to understand the data collection regimes for each of them.

table#{
border:1px solid !important;
border:none !important;
border-collapse: collapse !important;white-space: pre;}
tablew3t945 td {
border:none !important;
border-top:1px solid !important;
border-bottom:1px solid !important;
}
tablew3t945 td {border-color:bbbbbb !important;}

Phone 1Phone 2Phone 3Phone 4

Sattracking offtracking offtracking offtracking off

Tuehigh, 1 secmed, 1 sechigh, 15-30 secmed, 15-30 sec

Thuhigh, 1 secmed, 1 sechigh, 30 sectracking off

Fri + Sathigh, 1 secmed, 1 sechigh, 30 sectracking off

Next Tuehigh, 1 secmed, 1 sechigh, 30 sectracking off

 

Battery levels across phones (note the abrupt phase change that happens on Fri+Sat, and how the change is staggered across phones, consistent with an automatically updated component)

It is clear that on Tuesday, phones 2 and 3 are fairly close to each other, and both are very different from phone 1. This is consistent with intuition and results before Thursday as well.
On Thursday, the difference between phone 1 and phone 2 is much less pronounced, and the difference between phone 2 and phone 3 is also much larger. On Friday and this Tuesday, there is essentially no difference between high and medium accuracy at the fast sampling rate (phone 1 and phone 2), and no difference between slow sampling and no tracking (phone 3 and phone 4).
I also note that the GPS icon is constantly turned on, even on the phone where the tracking is stopped.

Of course, this could be a bug in my code, but:

I didn&8217;t really change the code between Tue and Thu, and
I don&8217;t get the notifications about activity changes on the phone where it is turned off, and
my app does not show up in the location or battery drain screens

Next steps
In the next few days, I plan to poke around at this some more to see if I can figure out what&8217;s going on. Some thoughts are:

uninstall my app. This is very annoying because then I have to record the battery level manually, but I can suck it up for a day.
uninstall potential culprits &; google play services, maps, ??? It turns out that most of these are system services that cannot be uninstalled, but I can try disabling them.
&;&8211;> your suggestion here <&8212;&8212;&8212; If you have any thoughts on things to try, let me know!

We can do this together
This is complicated because we are trying to treat the phone like a natural phenomenon that we cannot control but can try to understand through observation. I&8217;d love to hear from other members of the community so that we can figure out whether google is really continuously tracking us without letting us know, and killing our battery while doing so.

Quelle: Amplab Berkeley