A New Court Ruling Could Limit Your Employer Spying On You

Kirill Kudryavtsev / AFP / Getty Images

In the US, when it comes to your employer watching you at work, the law is clear: it can, and it probably does. The company you work for has wide latitude to peek into your Slack chats, monitor which sites you visit, read your emails, and record your every keystroke. It’s all legal. But in Europe, a new court ruling may start to limit employers that engage in this type of surveillance. These limitations may well extend to your American company, too — if you work for a multinational corporation that also employs people in Europe.

On Tuesday, the European Court of Human Rights ruled that companies can surveil their employees’ email — but only if workers are given an explanation about the policy in advance. At issue is a case that goes back to July 2007, when a Romanian man named Bogdan Mihai Barbulescu was fired after his bosses presented him with transcripts showing he used computer software to chat with his fiancée and brother at work. After the court ruled against him, Barbulescu escalated his case to the Court, which in its final ruling this week said Barbulescu’s right to privacy had indeed been violated — because he hadn’t been properly notified about the corporate surveillance.

“The European Court of Human Rights ruling is clear — workers do not leave their human rights at the doorstep of their workplace,” Esther Lynch, confederal secretary of the European Trade Union Confederation, told BuzzFeed News in an email.

According to James Froud, a partner at the international law firm Bird & Bird, the court’s final decision was not particularly surprising. ”The courts in Europe have pretty much always taken the view that the right to privacy extends into the workplace,” he says. But Froud told BuzzFeed News that this case could force employers to be clearer about their surveillance policies in the future. “Employers are likely to be required to do more,” Froud said. “It may no longer be enough to have a notice in an employment contract or hidden away in a policy.”

In Europe, privacy is widely held to be a fundamental human right, one that should be protected as much as possible in every setting. But at work, you’re using equipment, software, and an internet connection provided by your company. Every byte of data you send and receive is effectively owned by your company, which has the right to its property. And companies often lay out as much in their employment contracts.

This is just the application of pre-digital legal doctrine to the digital age, said Vivek Krishnamurthy, assistant director of Harvard Law School’s Cyberlaw Clinic, who specializes in international internet governance. “There’s a long line of court cases that deal with employers intercepting employee communications” in order to know whether they needed to discipline that employee, said Krishnamurthy. “Courts almost always come out favoring the employer.”

Nowadays, it is widely understood — and well-accepted — that every employee will use company resources to do some (reasonable) amount of personal life management at work. But the law hasn’t formally caught up to how people use technology at work. More sophisticated employers are starting to create policies that match up to the expectations of a modern employee (and if you’re lucky, you work for one of them). But they aren’t legally bound by duty to do so. “It’s a freebie,” Krishnamurthy said.

This latest ruling by Europe’s human rights court could nudge more companies towards that direction. “US multinational employers will need to take into consideration that there is a greater emphasis, from the European perspective, on the privacy of European employees,” said Stephen Ravenscroft, a London-based partner in the law firm White & Case who specializes in employment law.

But for everybody else, this ruling doesn’t change much. “There are relatively weak expectations of privacy at work,” said Krishnamurthy. For better or for worse, this is still the norm — and you should act accordingly.

“The proper way to approach what you’re doing at work is, just think your employer could be watching you, for any number of legitimate reasons — network security, monitoring bandwidth, you name it.” If you don’t want your employer finding out you’re doing something at work, just don’t do it, he said. “At a certain point, it’s just common sense.”

Quelle: <a href="A New Court Ruling Could Limit Your Employer Spying On You“>BuzzFeed

Facebook’s Russian Ads Disclosure Opens A New Front That Could Lead To Regulation

Afp / AFP / Getty Images

Facebook is facing a new push to reveal how its vast power is being used after it disclosed that roughly $100,000 worth of political ads were purchased on its platform by fake accounts and pages connected to a Russian troll operation. Open government advocates and researchers who study political ads tell BuzzFeed News that Facebook’s massive reach and lack of transparency about ads on its platform represent a risk to the democratic process.

Alex Howard, deputy director of the Sunlight Foundation, which advocates for government transparency, said highly targeted online ads can be “weaponized against liberal democracies” because they do not meet the same levels of disclosure and visibility as traditional radio, TV, and print ads.

“It removes our ability to have transparency into who is trying to influence our politics, and any accountability for that influence,” Howard said. “And it takes away from the capacity of the traditional organs of democracy — that being the press and regulators and other institutions — to figure out out who is behind political messaging, particularly at crucial times.”

Facebook and other tech giants have largely steered clear of major regulation in the United States despite their huge role in society. But concerns about the manipulation of political advertising by foreign entities and other parties is likely to increase government and regulatory scrutiny.

Sen. Mark Warner of Virginia, the top Democrat on the Senate intelligence committee, today said there may be a need to introduce new requirements for social media platforms running political ads.

“An American can still figure out what content is being used on TV advertising. … But in social media there's no such requirement,” Warner said, according to CNN. “There may be a reform process here. I actually think the social media companies would not oppose, because I think Americans, particularly when it comes to elections, ought to be able to know if there is foreign-sponsored content coming into their electoral process.”

Howard said the social platforms either need to come up with their own solution, or be prepared to face government intervention.

“There’s two different ways this can go,” Howard said. “Either these technology companies can show that they understand that transparency and disclosure of political ad spending on their networks is now a matter of significant public interest, and act to voluntarily disclose…. Or we’re going to see governments be reactive, and traditionally that’s when bad laws are made.”

Of particular focus for critics and congressional investigators is the use of so-called “dark post ads” by Russian trolls, as well as by campaigns, PACs, and other entities, to target specific Americans by geography, interest, and other data points. The Trump campaign invested tens of millions of dollars in targeted Facebook ads, and campaign strategists have openly credited this approach as being a major factor in victory.

Dark post ads — which Facebook calls “Unpublished Page post ads” — appear in a person's News Feed like any other ad, but are only visible to those being targeted. There is no way to identify the dark post ads being run by a particular page or account on Facebook. That means academics who have spent decades tracking and analyzing political ads, as well as fact checkers who try to keep campaigns and PACs honest, might never see the messages being fed to voters.

“It’s just very one sided and that’s when you get into aspects of propaganda in my mind,” said Shawn Parry Giles director of the University of Maryland's Center for Political Communication and Civic Leadership, which runs a project to track and analyze political advertising.

She believes campaigns and PACs will invest more of their advertising budgets in targeted online ads, fundamentally changing the way political advertising is done in the US.

“It’s gonna change how the campaigns are operating from this point forward and I don’t know that any of this is really good,” she said.

Erika Franklin Fowler, director of the Wesleyan Media Project, which tracks political ads aired on broadcast television during state and federal elections, said the trend is toward less knowledge and accountability for political ads, rather than more.

“I think it is unlikely that we will ever have as much knowledge about the content of advertising as we had previously,” Fowler told BuzzFeed News by email. “This poses challenges for researchers but it also poses challenges for accountability in democracy. If candidates (and outside groups) can say different things to different voters, it is harder to hold them accountable for campaign promises.”

Facebook’s deputy chief privacy officer previously told Reuters that the company does not disclose advertising details because it considers ad campaign information to be confidential.

“Advertisers consider their ad creatives and their ad targeting strategy to be competitively sensitive and confidential,” said Rob Sherman. “In many cases, they’ll ask us, as a condition of running ads on Facebook, not to disclose those details about how they’re running campaigns on our service. From our perspective, it’s confidential information of these advertisers.”

That’s generally true for ad campaigns in general. However, the rules are different in the United States when it comes to political advertising. Last year the FEC adopted expanded rules requiring TV service providers and licensees, as well as radio stations, to share their political advertising files in a single online database.

Howard of the Sunlight Foundation says Facebook, Google, and other major platforms should have to meet the same level of disclosure.

“If we’re going to say that the political ad files for television and and radio stations should be available online, I don’t see why we shouldn’t have that for the social networks too,” he said.

“It is very clear that between Facebook and Google they have upwards of 80% of online ad share, and that brings with it great responsibility,” Howard said, adding that “political speech is increasingly hosted on these platforms.”

He said unless platforms or regulators find a way to provide meaningful disclosure of online political ads, it’s “virtually inviting autocratic governments to take advantage of [our] openness to weaken us. And it’s gonna happen again and again and again.”

Quelle: <a href="Facebook’s Russian Ads Disclosure Opens A New Front That Could Lead To Regulation“>BuzzFeed

Online Fundraisers For DACA Recipients Raise Thousands Overnight

Via youcaring.com

In the immediate aftermath of the Trump administration’s repeal of DACA — the Obama-era rule that allowed some immigrants to work and go to school in the United States — activists, undocumented immigrants, and nonprofit organizations have taken to crowdfunding platforms like YouCaring and GoFundMe, raising thousands of dollars to support those impacted in only a few days.

The new rule gives some DACA recipients, or DREAMers just one month to renew their documents. The application costs $495. According the Federal Reserve, nearly half of all Americans would be unable to come up with $400 in the face of an emergency.

Prior to the Trump administration’s announcement on Tuesday, a number of DACA recipients were already using crowdfunding platforms to raise money for application fees, airfare and lodging to join a DACA rally in Washington D.C., or school tuition. But the amount of money being directed at these causes has spiked dramatically since the weekend.

Ernesto Lopez is a development manager with the Puente Human RIghts Movement in Phoenix, Arizona, which has so far raised $5,264 on YouCaring.

“I put this up at 8 p.m. [Tuesday] night, and in less than 24 hours, we were close to $5,000,” Lopez told BuzzFeed News. “People are energized, and want to do something, but sometimes people don’t know what to do. This is an opportunity where money actually makes a big difference.”

Puente helps undocumented immigrants file their paperwork with US Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS); Lopez said the money the organization raises, which so far is enough to cover about ten applications, will be distributed directly to people coming into their offices looking for help.

Another group, this one called Fuerza Colectiva in Seattle, raised more than $10,700 in less than two days. One of the group’s members, Leo Carmona, said the inability to afford the application fee is one major reason that undocumented immigrants don’t renew their permits.

“I myself am a DACA recipient. Thankfully, I just renewed my permit, but as someone who has been a student or who has lacked the resources to fund a $500 application, I saw the need of fundraising,” he told BuzzFeed News. “I think given the timeline, knowing it's only a month that they have to renew their permits, I felt it was extremely urgent for us to act.”

Rather than cover application costs in full, Carmona said his organization is asking applicants how much they can afford to pay, and offering to cover the rest.

In the case of one GoFundMe campaign, just a single tweet made a major impact. Muna Mire of BET tweeted about Cecilia Sierra’s request for $1,000 to help cover the cost of her DACA renewal. Mire’s tweet was retweeted 529 times, and Sierra met her goal in just a few hours.

(BuzzFeed News reached out to Sierra for comment, but didn’t immediately hear back.)

A spokesperson for YouCaring said the number of campaigns related to immigration issues has increased by 75% since last week. “We are also seeing that these campaigns are gathering momentum faster than usual and hitting their goals and even surpassing their funding goals in a matter of days, most likely thanks to the elevated profile of this particular cause in the news cycle and a heightened sense of urgency around it,” she wrote in an email statement.

GoFundMe said it has also seen an increase in campaigns supporting undocumented immigrants. “We are working with the campaign organizers to ensure the Dreamers receive the funds transferred as soon as possible,” a GoFundMe spokesperson wrote via email.

Other campaigns have raised far more with the help of social media. A group of activists named Zacil Vazquez, Graciela Marquez and Nube Cruz posted a campaign to YouCaring over the weekend. In less than a week, it has raised $57,372 from over 1,500 donors after being shared 6,000 times. Vazquez attributed the success of the campaign so far to the fact that all four organizers are undocumented immigrants or DACA recipients with roots in the activist community.

“We grew tired of nonprofits and others taking advantage of this to further their growth and decided to fundraise on our own,” said Cruz. “By us for us.”

In addition to wanting to help other DACA recipients, Cruze himself was worried about being able to get together enough money to pay for his own application. He used his Facebook page to ask for donations via Venmo; his fees were covered by donations from friends within 24 hours.

Meanwhile, in Texas, a campaign led by Dr. Dona Kim Murphey raised over $43,000 in just a week. Murphey started the campaign after Hurricane Harvey devastated a number of undocumented families in Houston. Murphey’s original goal was to set up a fund that would support four families with donations of $5,000 each, which they could use at their discretion for things like rebuilding homes, buying cars, covering lost wages, or paying lawyers. Having exceeded her initial goal, Murphey now hopes to support as many as ten families, if donations continue apace.

Quelle: <a href="Online Fundraisers For DACA Recipients Raise Thousands Overnight“>BuzzFeed

Disgraced Venture Capitalist Justin Caldbeck Threatened Legal Action Against One Of His Accusers

Disgraced Venture Capitalist Justin Caldbeck Threatened Legal Action Against One Of His Accusers

A screenshot of Justin Caldbeck's new title on LinkedIn.

(Ryan Mac/BuzzFeed News)

When investor Justin Caldbeck resigned from his San Francisco-based venture capital firm amid allegations of sexual harassment, he issued a statement thanking the women who had spoken out against him.

“I am deeply ashamed of my lack of self-awareness,” said the Binary Capital cofounder. “The dynamic of this industry makes it hard to speak up, but this is the type of action that leads to progress and change, starting with me.”

Privately, however, Caldbeck is threatening legal action against one of his accusers, who continues to talk openly about her experiences with the disgraced venture capitalist. BuzzFeed News has learned that Caldbeck’s lawyer sent a cease-and-desist letter to Niniane Wang, one of three women who went on the record with sexual harassment accusations, demanding that she stop saying that he intimidated a reporter and threatened professional retribution against other potential accusers. The letter, which was given to BuzzFeed News by a source familiar with the situation, also asked that Wang issue a public retraction of some statements she made about Caldbeck at a July business conference.

“… It has come to our attention that you have made a number of false statements about Justin in the media, most recently at a well attended Fortune media conference,” reads the letter. “The intent of this letter is to request that you stop making these false statements and that you correct them.”

Wang declined to comment on the letter. Caldbeck also declined to comment.

In a June article, technology news publication The Information revealed Caldbeck’s history of alleged sexual harassment, publishing accusations from six different women, including three who went on-the-record with their full names. Wang was one of those three; She recounted a year-long period of alleged harassment from Caldbeck starting in Aug. 2010 when she claims he tried to date her and on multiple occasions asked her to sleep with him. At the time, Wang, an experienced engineer who oversaw the creation of Google Desktop, was running a co-working space that was sponsored by Caldbeck’s then-employer. She initially agreed to meet with him with the understanding they would discuss business.

“There is definitely a cost to speaking out,” Wang told The Information when explaining her motivations to go public with her experience. She added that she hoped her story would encourage other women to speak out about misbehavior or unwanted advances in work settings.

Caldbeck initially denied all wrongdoing in a statement to The Information that ran when the story was published. He later issued a second statement that did not specifically address the accusations made by the women who'd accused him, but said he was “disturbed by the allegations.” Later, The Information revealed Caldbeck had threatened reporter Reed Albergotti with legal action via text message shortly after the story was published.

“Go fuck yourself reed [sic],” Caldbeck wrote. “Our lawyers will be in touch.”

Caldbeck subsequently apologized for that message, according to The Information editor Jessica Lessin.

Following the publication of The Information story, Wang continued to speak about her alleged experiences with Caldbeck. In a response to a June blog post commenting on Caldbeck’s statement, she claimed that “she had been trying for seven years” to expose the venture capitalist, and that he allegedly “kept threatening reporters,” making it difficult to get the story out.

“I do not believe that someone can harass women for 10 years, tell the people who exposed him to go fuck themselves, and then 24 hours later, thank them for bringing him self-awareness,” Wang wrote.

Niniane Wang speaks at the Fortune Brainstorm Tech Conference in Aspen, Colo. in July Stuart.

Stuart Isett/Fortune

Following the The Information's story, another female entrepreneur, Lindsay Meyer, told The New York Times that she had been groped and kissed by Caldbeck. Other reports also said that Stitch Fix CEO Katrina Lake had complained about Caldbeck's behavior to her investors, causing him to be removed from his position as a company board observer.

In July, Wang appeared at the Fortune Brainstorm Tech Conference in Aspen, Colo. and explained how she had worked closely with Albergotti on the story, joking that it had become her second job.

“In the past few months I had been working with a reporter and Justin had harassed many women by this point, including groping them, kissing them, warning them they’d never work in the industry again if they didn’t do what he wanted,” Wang said during an on-stage interview. “He was very litigious and threatening. The reporter had a new mortgage and a small child and was very afraid he would lose his mortgage if Justin made good on his threats.”

Caldbeck’s letter, dated on July 27 and sent by Ivo Labar, a partner at San Francisco law firm Kerr & Wagstaffe LLP, disputed those statements from Wang. The document contends that Caldbeck never threatened Albergotti prior to the publication of the story and disputes Wang’s claims that the venture capitalist threatened people who spoke out against him.

“While Justin disputes a number of the specific allegations that have been made against him and has a different recollection of the events with you, he continues to have deep regret over making you feel uncomfortable and recognizes that it is not ok,” reads the letter. “That being said, repeating other stories as facts when they are not is not something he can allow.”

Lessin, when asked about Wang’s allegations, said that Caldbeck did not personally threaten Albergotti before the story’s publication. She noted, however, the the reporter had heard that Binary Capital had sent a note to its limited partners “a few weeks” prior to publication suggesting that it would defend itself and Caldbeck against any allegations.

“We were certainly under the impression that he’d fight the story vigorously,” Lessin said.

In another allegation, the letter also challenges Wang's claim made in a Pando story that Caldbeck tried to pay her off in exchange for silence. The letter includes an excerpt of an email exchange between Caldbeck and Wang purportedly from February, but it is unclear what the messages show, if anything besides the fact that the two were communicating prior to the publication of The Information's story in June.

Labar claims that his client was given “no indication whatsoever that you were angry or uncomfortable with him.” And while Labar repeatedly states the letter is not a threat and reiterates some of Caldbeck’s apologies to Wang, he also says that his client reserves the right to litigate the matter.

Labar’s letter claims that Wang’s statements injured Caldbeck’s reputation and demands that she cease making them. It also asks that Wang make a public declaration to correct the statements Caldbeck contends are false, implying there may be legal consequences should she fail to do so. Two people close to Wang told BuzzFeed News they believe Wang has no plans to comply with Caldbeck’s demands.

It’s not yet clear if Wang replied to the letter, which requested a response within 10 business days from the date it was sent; she declined to comment for this story. But the threat of legal action has not seemingly discouraged her and she discussed her experience with Caldbeck on an Aug. 9 podcast for tech publication Recode.

“A big part of the reason why I said I didn’t believe Justin Caldbeck could change overnight was that he had been doing this for 10 years and had been actively thwarting attempts to reveal him,” Wang said. “So it was not as though he was ignorant of what he was doing.”

Beyond the cease-and-desist letter his attorney sent to Wang, Caldbeck, who has not taken any legal action against his accuser, has kept a low profile. He’s avoided interviews — and further scrutiny. He has, however, updated his LinkedIn page to show that he is no longer involved at Binary Capital.

He is now “Head of Self-Reflection, Accountability & Change.”

Here is a copy of the cease-and-desist letter.

Quelle: <a href="Disgraced Venture Capitalist Justin Caldbeck Threatened Legal Action Against One Of His Accusers“>BuzzFeed

Houseparty Doubles Down On Group Video Chat

Houseparty

With Facebook reportedly hard at work cloning its group video chat service, Houseparty is playing some offense.

Houseparty, an app which connects people with their friends in spontaneous video chats, is today releasing its first major product update — a new feature that lets users form groups of up to 16 people, and call them in organized video chats.

The new feature differs from Houseparty’s current dial-in-and-see-who’s-there functionality, and could appeal to users looking to use it for more practical purposes such as study group calls.

Houseparty has 20 million users and an average session time of 51 minutes, the company told BuzzFeed News, but it needs some new features to defend against an impending copycat offering from Facebook codenamed “Bonfire.” Houseparty hopes its new groups feature will encourage people to quickly create video calling groups for everything from sports teams to families, making it less tempting to switch over to a similar Facebook service should the social network launch one.

“If you already have your group somewhere — if everybody’s already there — why would you move?” Houseparty CEO and founder Ben Rubin told BuzzFeed News.

It’s a reasonable question. But a look at Snapchat’s struggles shows how devastating a Facebook clone can be — even for well-established app with a strong network. A year ago, Snapchat was riding high, heading towards an IPO with a fast-growing user base and a Stories feature that had people creating loads of fun, casual posts. Then, last August, Facebook copied Stories, bringing the cloned product first to Instagram and then to Facebook, Whatsapp, and Messenger as well. Now, Instagram Stories alone boasts more users than Snapchat. Meanwhile, shares in the app’s parent company, Snap Inc., are trading well below their IPO price.

Even Rubin, as optimistic as he is, concedes the prospect of competing with Facebook is a daunting one. “Nothing is invulnerable,” he told BuzzFeed News.

Houseparty

Like Meetup, which is currently under assault from Facebook’s Groups product, Houseparty’s pitch — “empower people to have more frequent conversations with the people they care about” — very closely aligns with Facebook’s new mission, “Give people the power to build community and bring the world closer together.” Given that, a Facebook clone of Houseparty seems an inevitability more than anything else.

With the launch of Facebook's Houseparty clone rumored for later this year, Rubin is bracing himself for a fight. But he won't let it become a singular focus. “We'll persevere,” he said. “We'll focus on our users; We'll think about our mission and we'll fucking grind it.”

Quelle: <a href="Houseparty Doubles Down On Group Video Chat“>BuzzFeed

Facebook, Apple, Google And Other Tech Companies Are Mad At Trump's Decision To End DACA

Silicon Valley condemned the Trump administration's announcement Tuesday that it would end Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals, which protects some young undocumented immigrants from deportation.

Young immigrants and supporters walk holding signs during a rally in support of Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals in Los Angeles on September 1, 2017.

Frederic J. Brown / AFP / Getty Images

The decision, which calls for the program to be wound down within the next six months, will affect an estimated 800,000 DREAMers, as people in the program are known. Tech executives at companies from Apple to Facebook to Airbnb said that unless the Republican-held Congress comes up with a legislative fix, the end of the program will strike a blow to the economy and to their workforces.

When news of the potential change leaked late last week, dozens of tech companies protested it by signing a letter circulated by the lobbying group FWD.us.

FWD.us President Todd Schulte once again issued a statement expressing displeasure with the decision on Tuesday morning.

We are incredibly disappointed by President Trump's decision to end DACA in six months, which will force 800,000 Dreamers out of their jobs and put them under threat of deportation, unless Congress acts. What this decision makes abundantly clear is that Congressional leaders on both sides of the aisle must immediately come together – right now – and pass a bipartisan Dream Act: 800,000 lives are quite literally at stake.

Dreamers are students, teachers, nurses, and engineers. They are young people who came to this country as children, and most only know America as home. For many years, congressional Republicans have said their objection to DACA was its implementation by executive action rather than via legislation. Now, the ball is in the GOP’s court: without the bipartisan Dream Act or a permanent legislative solution, an average of 1,400 new DACA recipients every single business day, for the next two years, will lose their ability to work legally and be subject to immediate deportation. And Democrats must be willing to negotiate in good faith with GOP leadership to reach a solution. Ultimately, every member of Congress must now decide whether they are going to allow Dreamers the chance to earn a path to citizenship by passing the bipartisan Dream Act, or whether they are going to watch as our neighbors and coworkers are ripped out of their jobs and our communities and deported to countries they may not even remember. No bill will be perfect, but inaction is unacceptable. Congress must act.

The time of reckoning is here – and we call on the American people to speak out and demand Congress pass a bipartisan Dream Act.

Mark Zuckerberg and Sheryl Sandberg criticized the decision in a pair of Facebook posts. “This is a sad day for our country,” the Facebook CEO wrote.

View Video ›

Facebook: zuck

View Video ›

Facebook: sheryl

Apple CEO Tim Cook sent a letter to employees worldwide, which reads in part:

I've received several notes over the weekend from Dreamers within Apple. Some told me they came to the U.S. as young as two years old, while others recounted they don't even remember a time they were not in this country.

Dreamers who work at Apple may have been born in Canada or Mexico, Kenya or Mongolia, but America is the only home they’ve ever known. They grew up in our cities and towns, and hold degrees from colleges across the country. They now work for Apple in 28 states.

They help customers in our retail stores. They engineer the products people love and they’re building Apple’s future as part of our R&D teams. They contribute to our company, our economy and our communities just as much as you and I do. Their dreams are our dreams.

At Uber, Chief Technology Officer Thuan Pham recounted in a personal note how he and his family fled Vietnam on a fishing boat when he was 10 years old.

“Immigrants often risk their lives for a chance at freedom and opportunity, and our country remains the world’s beacon of freedom and opportunity,” he wrote. “Immigrants have built and contributed to America since its very beginning, and are at the center of our social fabric and economic prosperity. My heart breaks to see so many people who are in the same situation today that I was in many years ago.”

Google CEO Sundar Pichai called for Congress to adopt legislation to defend DACA.

A Google spokesperson also told BuzzFeed News in a statement, “The DACA program has provided critical protections to hundreds of thousands of individuals, including Google employees and their families, allowing them to continue to make important contributions to our country, society, and economy. We are disappointed in today’s decision to end the program and urge Congress to take quick action to enact a permanent legislative solution.”

Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella tweeted his support for Dreamers, touting a blog post from the company's chief legal officer calling for Congress to reprioritize the fall legislative calendar and move quickly to protect the 800,000 Dreamers now at risk:

Sam Altman, president of Silicon Valley startup incubator Y Combinator:

Other tech companies — like Airbnb, Salesforce, eBay, and IBM — were quick to weigh in, too.

Oracle declined to comment. Co-CEO Safra Catz was on the executive committee of Trump's transition team.

The business community at large also spoke out against the decision.

Wells Fargo:

“Wells Fargo believes young, undocumented immigrants brought to America as children should have the opportunity to stay in the United States. DACA is relevant to our team members and the communities we serve.”

JPMorgan Chase CEO Jamie Dimon:

“America is and always has been a country of immigrants. We should do everything in our power to continue to attract the best and brightest because they make us stronger as a people and as an economy. And, when people come here to learn, work hard and give back to their communities, we should allow them to stay in the United States.”

Joshua Bolten, CEO of The Business Roundtable, a trade association representing large companies:

“Business leaders count on those employees to contribute to our enterprises, generate economic growth and create more jobs for Americans. The challenge in finding a solution for those covered temporarily by the DACA program is further evidence of the importance of working together to improve our system.”

This is a developing story. Check back for updates.

LINK: Tech Companies Are Signing This Letter In Defense Of DACA

Quelle: <a href="Facebook, Apple, Google And Other Tech Companies Are Mad At Trump's Decision To End DACA“>BuzzFeed

The Galaxy Note 8 Has The Best Camera Samsung’s Ever Made

The new smartphone has an impressive dual-lens camera, and a slightly smaller battery.

If there’s just one thing you need to know about Samsung’s Galaxy Note devices, it’s that they are, and always have been, Big Smartphones.

If there’s just one thing you need to know about Samsung’s Galaxy Note devices, it’s that they are, and always have been, Big Smartphones.

Nicole Nguyen / BuzzFeed

The Note was originally marketed as a “phablet,” a horrible portmanteau of “phone” and “tablet” that insinuates the thing is both portable and productive, or something. Power users (aka people who do a lot of shit on their phones) have historically gravitated towards the Note because of its roomy screen and its precious tiny stylus — two features that differentiated the Note from Samsung’s more popular Galaxy line, which aren’t as large and don’t come with a pen tool.

This year’s model, the Note 8, is still designed to be a workhorse. But it’s also so much more.

There are multi-tasking and note-taking features out the wazoo in this phone. But, for the first time, the Note is now *the* Samsung phone photographers (or, rather, phonenographers) should consider, because it has the best camera the Korean tech conglomerate has ever made. In other words, the Note’s stylus is no longer its only major selling point.

Aside from the impressive dual-lens camera, all other features are incremental improvements or carry-overs from last year’s disastrous Note 7, which shipped with faulty, exploding batteries and was recalled twice before finally being discontinued. The 8 has all the Samsung-y stuff: wireless charging, Gear VR compatibility, biometric security (iris and fingerprint scanning, and face recognition), 6GB RAM with 64GB of upgradable storage (mini SD cards up to 256GB), and compatibility with DeX, which is a dock, sold separately, that allows you to connect the phone to a monitor and use keyboard and mouse input.

The Note 8 has a smaller, more conservative battery, and Samsung says it’s “committed to quality” now more than ever, with an eight-point battery safety check that includes extreme testing and X-ray inspection, plus additional testing by a third-party company, Underwriters Laboratories. All of that sounds like a good thing.

I’ve spent a week with the Galaxy Note 8, and though I’m still not a fan of the company’s TouchWiz interface (all of the extra stuff Samsung adds to the phone on top of the Android operating system), it’s clear that this is the most capable Samsung phone ever made.

Let’s get right to it: that camera.

Let’s get right to it: that camera.

Most phones have one, wide-angle lens that forces you to zoom with your feet or zoom digitally (causing pixelation). The Note 8 has two 12-megapixel lenses: one standard wide-angle lens (f/1.7) and one telephoto lens (f/2.4) for close-ups, which you can take advantage of in a variety of ways.

The most obvious is being able to zoom in 2x, which is great for whale or bird watching or whatever. The second is that when you capture a close-up with the telephoto lens, the Note 8 automatically snaps a picture with the wide-angle lens too, so you can switch between the zoomed in and zoomed out versions of the pic.

(Click on the images below to see them up close.)

Nicole Nguyen / BuzzFeed News


View Entire List ›

Quelle: <a href="The Galaxy Note 8 Has The Best Camera Samsung’s Ever Made“>BuzzFeed

Facebook Will Fix Issue That Prevents You From Blocking Mark Zuckerberg

Paul Marotta / Getty Images

You can’t block Mark Zuckerberg on Facebook. Or his wife, Priscilla Chan. But the company is working to rectify the situation, Zuckerberg told BuzzFeed News.

Currently, when you try to block Zuckerberg or Chan, Facebook displays an error message. “Block Error. Sorry, there was a problem blocking Mark Zuckerberg. Please try again,” the app said when BuzzFeed News tried to block Zuckerberg on a mobile device last week. A similar message appears when you try to block Chan.

Zuckerberg told BuzzFeed News his team is working on a fix for this problem, but it’s a technical challenge that could take some time.

The error has been around since at least August 2010, when TechCrunch noticed it. And it doesn’t only prevent people from blocking Zuckerberg and Chan, but anyone who’s been blocked frequently in a short amount of time, a Facebook spokesperson told BuzzFeed News. Facebook doesn’t have any “unblockable” accounts — its system simply gets busy.

“I can tell you that people trying to block a profile or Page may see an error message if it has been blocked many times within a short period,” the Facebook spokesperson said. “This temporary message does not prevent people from reporting profiles or Pages that they think are in violation of our Community Standards.”

In 2010, Facebook shed more light onto why it coded the system this way; It’s meant to limit the unintentional damage of targeted blocking campaigns. ”In very rare instances, a viral campaign will develop instructing lots of people to all wrongly block the same person,” a Facebook spokesperson told Mashable at the time. “The purpose of this system is to protect the experience for people targeted by these campaigns.”

But much has changed for Facebook since 2010, and for Zuckerberg too. In August 2010, an estimated 400 million people used Facebook, which was 18 months ahead of its IPO. Today, more than 2 billion people use Facebook, now a publicly traded company worth $492 billion.

Facebook’s rise has propelled Zuckerberg into one of the most powerful positions on the planet. Followed by more than 95 million people on Facebook, Zuckerberg has used his influence to speak up on a variety of political issues, most recently in support of Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA), which is currently under threat. He’s also traveled the United States this year, meeting with people around the country and reporting back what he’s learned about issues such as fracking and preservation. Zuckerberg's steering of the Facebook product also has a subtle but profound impact on the way his platform’s users share and receive information.

With such influence, Facebook’s limiting its users ability to block Zuckerberg’s profile seemed, to many, a bit off. Now, the company is on its way toward resolving the issue.

Quelle: <a href="Facebook Will Fix Issue That Prevents You From Blocking Mark Zuckerberg“>BuzzFeed

The Wage Gap In Tech In LA Is Getting Worse

FORT LAUDERDALE, FL – MARCH 14: Elana Goodman joins with other protesters to ask that woman be given the chance to have equal pay as their male co-workers on March 14, 2017 in Fort Lauderdale, Florida. The protest was held as the legislation in the state of Florida looks at passing the Helen Gordon Davis fair pay protection act that would strengthen state laws in terms of equal pay. (Photo by Joe Raedle/Getty Images)

Joe Raedle / Getty Images

The tech sector in Los Angeles has grown in the last decade — but women who work in the field here have been falling behind. According to data compiled by LiveStories based on the most recent American Community Survey, the gender pay gap in tech in Los Angeles has worsened. From 2006 to 2010, women in tech in LA made 97 cents for every dollar men made, one of the highest ratios in the country. But by 2015, women in tech in LA were only making 82 cents for that same men's dollar — a drop of 17%.

That's still higher than the 80 cents for every dollar that the average woman in the U.S. makes. Still, not only has no other occupation in the area become so much less equitable so quickly according to the survey data, but this also places LA among the worst places in the country for income parity in tech. In an industry dogged by pay disparity issues — in addition to several well-publicized sexual harassment and gender discrimination lawsuits — it's troubling that, at least in LA, this disparity has grown. (LiveStories' data encompasses the City of Los Angeles where Facebook, Google, Snap and YouTube all have offices. Santa Monica, which also hosts a number of tech companies, is not included.)

It's particularly surprising since, as a recent study by Hired.com showed, the wage gap is lowest at seed stage companies. According to the study, “Smaller companies have more institutional transparency into the salaries of everyone on the team, which can ultimately negate possible gender pay disparities.”

But tech jobs aren't just at small startups. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, jobs in this sector include a wide swath of professions — computer scientists, computer programmers, web developers, and database administrators, but also actuaries and mathematicians.

The most recent year for which American Community Survey data is available is 2015. That's also the year that California passed a Fair Pay Act, mandating that men and women be paid equally in the private sector starting Jan. 1, 2016. Employers are also barred from pay disparities that stem from differences in past salaries. It's possible, given the new law, that the pay disparity in LA will decrease in the coming years. But with companies like Google resisting orders to reveal pay data, it may take some time before we know.

Quelle: <a href="The Wage Gap In Tech In LA Is Getting Worse“>BuzzFeed