Goodbye Juicero, Silicon Valley's Favorite $400 Juicer

Juicero

There's nothing left to squeeze out of Juicero.

On Friday, the lavishly funded Silicon Valley startup said it was going down the drain, suspending sales of its Juicero Press and Produce Packs immediately. No longer will it sell its $400 (originally $700) machine that spits out eight-ounce glasses of juice as long as your Wi-Fi was working. Instead, it will search for an acquirer to “carry forward the Juicero mission.”

Juicero's announcement that it was seeking a buyer was a disappointment to everyone who believed the future of nutrition lay in five flavors of individual juice packs, delivered weekly. It was also blow to those lacked the strength to squeeze them with their bare hands.

“Not all juice is equal. … How do you measure life force? How do you measure chi?”

Juicero's supporters included some of the valley's highest-profile venture capital firms, from Kleiner Perkins Caufield Byers to Peter Thiel's Thrive Capital to GV (formerly Google Ventures), big companies like Campbell Soup, and other investors who poured nearly $120 million into the enterprise before it launched in March 2016. They believed that it would tap into time-pressed consumers' obsession with wellness and fresh produce.

It was a strategy that won over some high-profile fans like Ivanka Trump.

Juicero's most fervent believer was its CEO, Doug Evans, who came up with the idea after finding flaws with every juicer on the market. “It didn’t have the magic that I was accustomed to,” he has said of them. “Not all juice is equal,” he has also said. “How do you measure life force? How do you measure chi?”

Evans likened his product development process to that of Steve Jobs. “I said, 'I'm going to do what Steve did,'” he recounted to Recode. “'I'm going to take the mainframe computer and create a personal computer. I'm going to take a mainframe juice press and I'm going to create a personal juice press,' and my original design was supposed to be easy to clean.”

Sadly, Juicero's lifespan — without an acquirer — seems to be slightly shorter than Apple's. The company says it will offer refunds for the next 90 days.

So long, Juicero.

Quelle: <a href="Goodbye Juicero, Silicon Valley's Favorite 0 Juicer“>BuzzFeed

Alexa, Play "My Neck, My Back"

Alexa, Play "My Neck, My Back"

Casey Picker had a surprise when the song “iSpy” by Kyle (feature Li' Yachty) came on his Echo. It's a catchy kid-friendly tune, but it does feature some not exactly kid-friendly words. Lyrics like “I won't fuck a bitch without a rubber” might help teach your teens about the importance of safe sex, but they're probably not ideal for younger ones.

youtube.com

Amazon Music doesn't offer yet explicit language filters. Which means that the company's Echo and Dot smart speakers — which use Amazon Music as a default streaming service — don't yet offer profanity-free versions of the music that, say, a plucky 7-year-old might ask it to play. Amazon told BuzzFeed News the company is “actively working on a solution to this issue,” but it didn't say what that solution might be or when it's expected to arrive.

Amazon Alexa does have some built-in filters for cusswords. For example, if it's reading a message someone texted you through the Alexa platform, it will bleep out the word “fuck.” I've tested this, of course.

Fretting about explicit lyrics in songs is very 1985 Tipper Gore, I know. Sure, your kid's head won't explode should she hear a few cuss words. But it's reasonable for parents to want to avoid f-bomb exposure, if for no reason other than kids love to repeat naughty words just to annoy adults.

I'm no prude (see, I'll prove it: butts, fart, crap, fuck, turd, shit), but even I sometimes find myself shocked by the explicit lyrics in pop songs. Ever have that experience where you hear the “real” version of a song you only ever heard on the radio, and you're shocked, SHOCKED! at all the dirty words? Like that Enrique Iglesias hit song that goes “tonight I'm loving you…” but then you discover he's planning on doing something way more than “loving” you?? Yeah, that.

Here's the current state of explicit lyric filtering on streaming services:

No Explicit Lyric Filters:

  • Tidal

  • Spotify

  • Amazon Music

Yes Explicit Lyric Filters:

  • Apple Music

  • Pandora

  • Google Music

Echo and Dot devices are popular with kids for obvious reasons: they're basically toys that talk to you. There are tons of kid-friendly apps for them that tell jokes or serve up fun facts about animals. The devices can help spell words, or do math problems. In fact, in a lot of ways, the Echo and the Dot seem more appropriate for kids than adults.

There's been a smattering of handwringing that Echos are turning kids into assholes who never have to tell Alexa, “please,” or are enablers of unforeseen consumer binges. Consider the viral story of a girl who ordered an expensive dollhouse and four pounds of cookies; Then in a Murphy's Law self-suck, the TV news coverage of that story triggered viewers Echos to place orders for the same items.

But for the most part, the Echo and Dot are devices that kids love. Amazon seems to know it, and has actively marketed them to parents in the form of both back to school sales and kid-specific skills. So the fact that the Echo doesn't yet have a kid-friendly music offering is surprising — and frustrating for more than a few parents. Indeed, Amazon customer forums show threads of parents frustrated and confused as to why they can't stop their kids from hearing naughty music.

While Amazon is working on a solution to the issue, it's unclear when it might arrive. So in the meantime here's a suggested workaround: only listen to Swedish death metal, so your kids can't understand it (unless you speak Swedish, in which case, you're fucked).

Quelle: <a href="Alexa, Play "My Neck, My Back"“>BuzzFeed

Here's A Letter Tech Companies Are Signing To Urge Trump To Protect Young Immigrants

In a letter circulated by the Silicon Valley lobbying group FWD.us, tech companies are voicing opposition to reports that President Trump will end an Obama-era program that allows young, undocumented immigrants to stay in the United States.

Frederic J. Brown / AFP / Getty Images

On Thursday, Fox News reported that Trump will end Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals, the program also known as DACA, as early as Friday. Enacted by the Obama administration in 2012, the policy grants young immigrants who meet certain criteria a temporary reprieve from deportation. The reports are unconfirmed as of now.

But the news elicited strong criticism from tech companies, which say immigrants are a crucial part of their workforce. Uber and Microsoft publicly condemned the reported changes on Thursday. Meanwhile, FWD.us is collecting signatures on a letter that protests the potential move.

The letter has not yet been released, but BuzzFeed News obtained a current version of it. FWD.us declined to comment.

Open Letter from Leaders of American Industry

Since the country’s birth, America has been the land of opportunity – welcoming newcomers and giving them the chance to build families, careers, and businesses. In turn, our nation has been strengthened and fueled by the energy, drive, and passion of immigrants. As entrepreneurs and business leaders, we are concerned about new developments in immigration policy that threaten the future of Dreamers, young undocumented immigrants brought to America as children.

The Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program, which allows nearly 800,000 Dreamers the basic opportunity to work and study without the threat of deportation, is in jeopardy. All DACA recipients grew up in America, registered with our government, submitted to extensive background checks, and are diligently giving back to our communities and paying income taxes. More than 97 percent are in school or in the workforce, 5 percent started their own business, 65 percent have purchased a vehicle, and 16 percent have purchased their first home. At least 72 percent of the top 25 Fortune 500 companies count Dreamers among their employees.

Unless we act now to preserve the DACA program, all 780,000 hardworking young people will lose their ability to work legally in this country, and every one of them will be at immediate risk of deportation. Our economy would lose $460.3 billion from the national GDP and $24.6 billion in Social Security and Medicare tax contributions.

Dreamers are vital to the future of our companies and our economy. With them, we grow and create jobs. They are part of why we will continue to have a global competitive advantage.

We call on President Trump to preserve the DACA program. We call on Congress to pass the bipartisan DREAM Act.

It’s the right thing to do for America.

In response to a query from BuzzFeed News, Lyft confirmed that co-founders Logan Green and John Zimmer have signed it. BuzzFeed News has learned that Uber has also signed it. Sources told BuzzFeed News that Google intends to sign it as well. This post will be updated with more names as they become public.

In a public statement, Uber said it opposes ending DACA.

“Dreamers grew up here, live here, and are contributing to our communities and our economy,” an Uber spokesperson said in a statement Thursday. “Their contributions make America more competitive and they deserve the opportunity to work, study, and pursue the American dream.”

So did Microsoft.

“DACA recipients bring a wide array of educational and professional backgrounds that enable them to contribute in crucial ways to our nation’s workforce,” said president Brad Smith in a blog post. “They are part of our nation’s universities and work in every major industry. They are artists, advocates and health care providers. They help meet the needs of our communities and our companies.

CEO Satya Nadella followed up with a more personal note on LinkedIn. “As I shared at the White House in June, I am a product of two uniquely American attributes: the ingenuity of American technology reaching me where I was growing up, fueling my dreams, and the enlightened immigration policy that allowed me to pursue my dreams,” he wrote.

This is a developing story. Check back for updates and follow BuzzFeed News on Twitter.

Quelle: <a href="Here's A Letter Tech Companies Are Signing To Urge Trump To Protect Young Immigrants“>BuzzFeed

Labor Board Files Complaint Against Tesla

Brendan Smialowski / AFP / Getty Images

In April, when Tesla employees interested in unionizing claimed the electric car company was illegally intimidating them, Tesla dismissed the allegations as “entirely without merit.”

But the National Labor Relations Board disagrees. On Thursday, the Oakland regional office of the NLRB filed a complaint against Tesla, having found merit in the employee’s charges of coercion and interference.

In February, the United Automobile Workers union filed four separate charges with the National Labor Relations Board alleging Tesla had illegally surveilled and coerced factory workers attempting to distribute information about the union drive.

The NLRB complaint filed Thursday provides further detail about what happened in February. It notes that security guards asked the employees distributing leaflets to produce employee ID badges, and told them to leave the premises. The complaint also cites Tesla’s confidentiality agreement, which says workers are prohibited from communicating with the media, sharing photos of their work facility on social media, or forward work emails to a personal account, among other things. It also names at least three individual Tesla managers or supervisors who personally “interrogated” employees about union activities or “attempted to prohibit” employees from discussing union activities.

As such, wrote NLRB regional director Valerie Hardy-Mahoney, the agency determined that Tesla “has been interfering with, restraining and coercing employees in the exercise of their rights.”

The board’s complaint isn’t the last word on the case. It will next be reviewed by an administrative law judge at a hearing. It could also be settled.

For its part, Tesla continues to say the union’s allegations are baseless.

“For seven years, the UAW has used every tool in its playbook: misleading and outright false communications, unsolicited and unwelcomed visits to the homes of our employees, attempts to discredit Tesla publicly in the media, and now another tactic that has been used in every union campaign since the beginning of time — baseless ULP [unfair labor practices] filings that are meant only to generate headlines,” a Tesla spokesperson wrote via email. “These allegations, which have been filed by the same contingent of union organizers who have been so outspoken with media, are entirely without merit.” (The full statement is published in full below.)

The workers who initially brought the charges are part of a unionization effort that calls itself Fair Future at Tesla. A spokesperson from that group provided a statement from some of the workers.

“I joined others in filing the charges for myself, but I also did it for my coworkers — they need to know we have rights, and that we can speak up about what we are seeing and experiencing,” said Tesla production associate Jonathan Galescu in a statement. “I want to thank the NLRB for hearing us and the UAW for having our backs as we continue our fight to address the issues on the shop floor and form our union.”

The NLRB case against Tesla is directly linked to the UAW’s attempt to form a union at Tesla’s Fremont, CA factory, where workers have publicly alleged long hours, low pay, and dangerous working conditions, resulting in frequent 911 calls and countless long term injuries.

The confidentiality agreement is a particular bone of contention; Tesla has insisted that the agreement it asks workers to sign — which prohibits them from sharing photos of Tesla’s facility or talking about work on social media, among other things — is typical of any tech company. But back in February, California lawmakers warned Tesla in a letter that its confidentiality agreement was overreaching, and could have a “a chilling effect on workers' ability to engage in protected activity,”

In May, Tesla replaced its head of human resources, part of a larger department shakeup that followed the union effort, allegations of dangerous working conditions, and potential labor law violations that occurred in the course of Tesla’s union drive.

Tesla CEO Elon Musk has pushed back against the allegations that the Fremont factory is unsafe, or that workers are paid less than those employed elsewhere in the auto industry; he’s also apologized to workers, reportedly spent time working next to them on the factory line, and offered to install free frozen yogurt machines throughout the plant.

But these are tough times at Tesla, with production of the latest car, the Model 3, ramping up to meet Musk’s stated goal of high production volume by September. In an earnings call earlier this month, Musk warned that the company would experience “at least six months of production hell.”

Tesla’s hearing at the National Labor Relations Board is scheduled for November 14.

Here's Tesla's full statement on the NLRB's complaint against it:

“As we approach Labor Day weekend, there’s a certain irony in just how far the UAW has strayed from the original mission of the American labor movement, which once advocated so nobly for the rights of workers and is the reason we recognize this important holiday. Faced with declining membership, an overwhelming loss at a Nissan plant earlier this month, corruption charges that were recently leveled against union leaders who misused UAW funds, and failure to gain traction with our employees, it’s no surprise the union is feeling pressured to continue its publicity campaign against Tesla. For seven years, the UAW has used every tool in its playbook: misleading and outright false communications, unsolicited and unwelcomed visits to the homes of our employees, attempts to discredit Tesla publicly in the media, and now another tactic that has been used in every union campaign since the beginning of time – baseless ULP filings that are meant only to generate headlines. These allegations, which have been filed by the same contingent of union organizers who have been so outspoken with media, are entirely without merit. We will obviously be responding as part of the NLRB process.”

Quelle: <a href="Labor Board Files Complaint Against Tesla“>BuzzFeed

After Harvey, Small Social Networks Prove Their Might

The North Houston Rescue Zello Channel

On Wednesday morning, with flood waters still rising in Houston, voices bubbled inside the relatively obscure walkie-talkie app Zello, coordinating a volunteer effort to get help to those in need.

“I have an 18-foot flat bottom aluminum boat, I need to know where to go this morning,” one member of the app’s 500-plus person North Houston Rescue channel told the group.

”Is there any need for a couple of jet skis and four guys?” another asked. Almost instantly and with calm precision, group administrators directed them to areas that could use their help.

In the aftermath of Hurricane Harvey — which has left thousands seeking shelter — small, locally oriented social networks like Zello are showing their strength as organizing tools. Though social networks are an imperfect substitute for rescue infrastructure, a listen into Zello, or a peek into Nextdoor (where neighbors are working to inform and help each other), or even a visit to Harvey-related Facebook groups shows why people are relying on these networks. They are focused, intensely local, and put critical information in front of the right audiences quickly with little distraction or noise.

“It’s not 911, but it’s pretty effective,” Zello CEO Bill Moore told BuzzFeed News. The app, used exactly like a Walkie Talkie, is filed with channels made up of dozens of members spread far apart, something the traditional devices cannot support.

Harvey related channels dominate Zello's Trending section

Houston volunteer organizations seem to think so too. Houston-area app opens on Zello are up 600% compared to last week, with an average session time of more than 22 minutes, Moore said. The app’s new user registration in the Houston area is up 20 times over last week.

Moore said Zello is effective because it helps people convey a sizable amount of information, along with emotion and level of urgency, quickly — so responses come fast. “It’s a higher burden but because of that it’s pretty effective and it creates a level of trust.”

Zello is working so well that some people are using Facebook to direct people to the download the app. “I am overwhelmed and can't coordinate the amount of volume of requests for rescues….here is a better way… Download the Zello App,” Tricia Bell Montalbano, a Houston resident helping with the relief effort, wrote on Facebook this Monday. “There are boats and rescuers responding thru this app to help people. Please share so people know how to get people on a rescue list!!”

Houston-area residents are also flocking to neighborhood-based social app Nextdoor, using it to share updates with their neighbors and offer help. On Sunday, Houston resident Joseph Graham tweeted a screenshot from a Nextdoor community where one resident’s home was filling up with water. “A rescue is desperately needed,” the resident wrote. “Have been calling for help but can't get through.” Within an hour, a fellow Nextdoor member got them on a boat and they were off to safety.

“That was one of several moments that made me tear up,” Graham, who lives in Houston's Historic Heights neighborhood, told BuzzFeed News. “We live in a big city, so it’s not super neighborly. When you’re online and everyone’s in need, everybody drops that big city mentality. It’s a very Houston moment, everybody dropping everything to help each other.”

Taylor Darnell, a resident of Houston’s East Downtown district, told BuzzFeed News that her Nextdoor community has featured running updates on flooded streets, volunteer requests, and places to give donations. She’s solicited donations inside Nextdoor herself, for a non-profit she runs that’s providing backpacks to students impacted by the storm. Darnell, an infrequent Nextdoor user before Harvey, said she regularly checks the app before other social platforms and the news. “Everyone that you’re connecting with is in a radius where the same thing that’s happening to you is most likely happening to them,” she said. “It helps a lot.”

Nextdoor has been proactive too. The company partnered with the National Weather Service months ago to distribute weather alerts. Before Harvey hit, he NWS used Nextdoor to notify Houston-area residents of the incoming storm, sending them information to prepare for it and take action when it arrived.

Requests for updates inside Taylor Darnell's Nexdoor community

Taylor Darnell

Member activity in the affected areas is five times greater than normal, Nextdoor told BuzzFeed News, and its membership in those areas is up 650%. Close to 100 local agencies are using Nextdoor to connect with residents in the affected areas, the company said.

Though Facebook is a major social platform of more than 2 billion members, its groups form individual mini-social networks of their own, operating outside the usual broadcast-style method of sharing content on the platform. And these groups have been active too, used to coordinate everything from animal rescue to boat dispatch.

Though small social networks have proven indispensable to some, they also come with risks. The hype around their utility can cause people to view them as a savior, even though they don't employ the tried and true methods of a system like 911.

There is also a risk of vigilantism. In Zello’s North Houston Rescue channel, for instance, the discussion Wednesday turned to looters after one member of the group suggested shooting them on sight. “Where are the looters located? We do have weapons on board,” one group member volunteered. Eventually, a trickle of group members insisted looters be left alone. And the topic was dropped.

“Oh, it’s used for bad, yes. Cartels, gangs, ISIS and others. Like any communications tool, it’s used for good and evil both,” Zello’s Moore said. “It’s a net positive but it’s not without risk. It doesn’t replace law.”

Lam Thuy Vo and Blake Montgomery contributed reporting to this story.

Quelle: <a href="After Harvey, Small Social Networks Prove Their Might“>BuzzFeed

This Teen Troll Fled To The US For Political Asylum. Now He's Stuck In A Detention Center

This Teen Troll Fled To The US For Political Asylum. Now He's Stuck In A Detention Center

In March 2015, as Singaporeans were publicly mourning the death of their country’s revered founder, Lee Kuan Yew, a 16-year-old named Amos Yee was busy putting together a celebratory YouTube video entitled “Lee Kuan Yew Is Finally Dead!”

Addressing an imagined audience of millions in a pubescent falsetto, from the apartment he shared with his mother, the teen called Lee a megalomaniac, a dictator, and a fraud. He called the late president a “horrible person” and “awful leader”; later in his eight-minute rant, he compared Lee to Jesus Christ. The analogy was not meant to flatter: Yee is a committed internet atheist who looks up to the secularist writer Richard Dawkins, chafes at political correctness, and admits to particularly enjoying going after Islam. Yee ended his monologue wishing the dead politician “good riddance.”

Amos Yee

YouTube / Via youtube.com

The rant spread quickly. (It’s now been viewed over a million times.) Eager to extend his 15 minutes, Yee followed the video by posting a drawing of Lee having anal sex with former British Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher.

Two days after he posted his video, he was arrested and thrown in jail under Singapore’s draconian speech laws. Over the next year and a half, his lawyers argue, he suffered sustained political persecution in his native country. After a slew of criminal charges, two trials, weeks in prison and jail, and a court order to stop posting on social media, Yee decided he’d had enough. On Dec. 16, 2016, he flew to Chicago and declared his intention to seek political asylum in the United States.

Like all asylum-seekers, Yee came here expecting to gain freedoms, not lose them. “I escaped to America so I could exercise my free speech,” he told me over the phone in April. “If I did that in Singapore, they’d send me to prison for a very long time,” he added, noting that be incarceration “is not economical. I had big ambitions.”

But Yee has now spent more time behind bars here in the United States than he ever did back home, waiting for hearings, motions, appeals, and counter-appeals to make their way through a byzantine bureaucracy that’s growing increasingly hostile to all foreigners, from skilled Swedish tech workers to Iranian grandmas. He’s getting a crash course in American social dynamics as he observes racial divides, economic inequality, and mass incarceration firsthand.

He’s also been offline for close to eight months. So much for that free internet.

Will America’s first troll government take in one of his own?

How Yee got here — and, indeed, why a citizen of a wealthy, sophisticated developed country would need to beg the US government for asylum at all — speaks to what happens when politics are global, but the right to express them is not. It’s a story about the regulation of the internet, and whether it’s reasonable for a government to grant its citizens the right to read and watch what they like online, but not express the views they form themselves. It’s about how a child’s blog can end up having lifelong repercussions; it’s about whether the Trump administration’s hard line on immigrants and refugees will extend to someone whom human rights groups around the world have described as a prisoner of conscience.

The results of Yee’s case could also set an important precedent: whether an individual whom the US government considers, in its own words, an internet “troll” can qualify for asylum by claiming political persecution. Will America’s first troll government take in one of his own?

Yee, out on bail, speaks to reporters outside the State Courts after he was jailed for six weeks for insulting Muslims and Christians, in Singapore on Sept. 29, 2016

Afp / AFP / Getty Images

Yee, who is now 18, cuts a familiar figure to anyone who’s browsed the atheism subreddit or gotten into an argument about the First Amendment with a contrarian debate team captain. He has long black hair; a squeaky, high voice; and the wispy pallor of an indoor kid. In jail, he’s been reading books by David Foster Wallace, and has gotten seriously into chess.

His ideology is a hodgepodge of au courant and often inconsistent convictions: He believes in unfiltered free expression, logical reasoning, and the practice of questioning everything. He hates religion, Singapore’s one-party state, and the conformist society he was brought up in.

If Yee were an American high schooler, he might be grounded. But Singapore thrives on order.

If Yee were an American high schooler, he might be grounded. But Singapore thrives on order. Many Singaporeans are brought up with deep-rooted Taoist, Buddhist, and Confucian values, conveyed at home and in school. You could compare the city-state’s penal system to a beefed-up, nationwide “broken windows” policy that aims to stop untoward behavior before it begins. If you litter, chew gum, or forget to flush in a Singaporean public restroom, you can be ticketed, fined, jailed, even caned. Homosexuality is illegal; you can’t buy or sell pornography. Police have even been known to bust public urination in alleys and elevators after the fact with special pee-detection devices.

What’s more, Article 14 of the Singaporean Constitution states that speech can be curbed “in the interest of public order or morality” so that citizens of the diverse country’s Chinese, Malay, South Asian, and expatriate communities can coexist in peace and prosperity. Publishers must obtain licenses to operate there; Singapore is 151st on Reporters Without Borders’ World Press Freedom list, between Ethiopia and Swaziland. And there is a law that prohibits insulting people’s religions, much for the same reason.

Yee in Singapore on June 2, 2015.

Roslan Rahman / AFP / Getty Images

The goal of these directives is to create a harmonious, considerate, prosperous society, but the consequence is a country that feels like it’s run by philosopher kings who got tired of the big questions and became management consultants instead. Alfred Dodwell, a lawyer who represented Yee pro bono in Singapore, called it a “benevolent dictatorship.”

Nothing conveys these mores quite like Haw Par Villa, a theme park on the outskirts of the city made up of a series of statues and gruesome dioramas depicting crime and punishment. Parents take their children there for a lesson in morality from the decapitated traitors, burning prostitutes, and disemboweled cheaters rendered in clay. Given the culture, Dodwell said, “when you have a teenager who’s hardly lived enough years to question anything coming up and speaking up against an elder, it’s frowned upon.”

By Singaporean standards, Yee had done something extraordinary in simply flouting the social contract. But to Americans, his trajectory sounds downright cliché: a classic case of alienation, frustration, and rebellion that happened to have played out in a socially conservative Asian city-state, not a suburban sprawl. In that respect, Yee is suffering from a common affliction: being born in the wrong place.

Yee’s video, and the lewd cartoon that followed it, wound up on the Singaporean government’s radar, apparently due to dozens of citizen complaints. It was not well-received: Not only was he acting out of line as a child, he was also criticizing an adored political figure. On March 29, two days after he published the video, Yee was arrested and charged with spreading obscenity, the “deliberate intention of wounding racial or religious feelings,” and “threatening, abusive or insulting communication.” His bail provisions mandated that he stop posting on social media in a public fashion. He flouted them, crowdfunding his legal bills and writing to his followers on Facebook.

This resulted in another arrest. He spent the night in jail before a relative bailed him out and Dodwell offered to represent him. The lawyer got more than he signed up for. “I thought it would be a simple case of representing a boy,” he recalls. “Not an international phenomenon.”

Yee’s first trial took place that summer. He was found guilty of uploading obscene content and offending Christians. In a presentencing report that June, he was described as showing signs of autism, then taken to a psychiatric hospital for “reformative training” for two weeks, where he was held in solitary confinement, tied down, and forcibly medicated, according to legal documents. This time counted toward his four-week jail sentence, which he was handed in July. He turned down an offer to serve probation instead.

As soon as he was free, Yee was back at it, posting on YouTube, apparently thriving on his newfound fame, and making increasingly shocking statements — notably, on Twitter, that sex with minors was not necessarily nonconsensual. This brought on more charges, another trial, an appeal, a guilty conviction, a sentence, and six more weeks in prison. He would not yield to the government’s orders; they would not back down despite his lawyers’ pleas.

International human rights organizations have condemned the Singaporean government for its treatment of Yee. Amnesty International “considers him to be a prisoner of conscience, held solely for exercising his right to freedom of expression.” Human Rights Watch wrote that “the Singapore government has subjected Amos Yee to a sustained pattern of persecution, including intimidation, arrest and imprisonment for publicly expressing his views on politics and religion, and severely criticizing the government leaders.”

Dodwell argued that Yee’s age was a factor, too. “For me, when a child is being difficult or saying these things, I wouldn’t accept it,” he says. “But it’s not criminal. He’s been extremely rude and perhaps even vulgar, but it’s not a crime. That’s the angle at which we came at. But regrettably we couldn’t convince the judge.”

By the fall of 2016, Yee was done with his second prison term – four weeks in prison, two under house arrest — and living at home with his mother, whom he fought with and swore at constantly. He’d dropped out of school, traveled some, and had no plans to attend college. He had his heart set on becoming a famous YouTuber.

His legal bills and battles loomed before him. But at least he had the internet. And he’d become a public figure — and loved it. “I wanted to make a mark on the world and get the greatest amount of publicity,” he said.

As Yee’s case gained prominence, he found champions and kindred spirits on the other side of the world. It’s not hard to see why internet atheists and free speech advocates of various persuasions were drawn to Yee’s battle: Here was a kid who was unafraid to lay into organized religion in the crudest of terms, and was punished not just by squishy social norms but by an actual repressive government. His case seemed black and white: a perfect vehicle onto which they could unleash their own frustrations with what they saw as a double standard governing who gets to say what, and who’s protected by conventions around free speech.

For Melissa Chen — a 31-year-old Singaporean biologist who came to the US for college and has, over the years, become a relatively prominent figure in the American secular/atheist community — Yee’s story was personal: As a fellow Singaporean who’d attended religious schools, she identified with Yee’s “contrarian, rebellious side.”

“Singapore punishes nonconformists,” Chen told me, sounding almost parental toward Yee. “It’s a very communitarian culture. You acknowledge that some things are better not said or not done of the sake of social harmony and the greater good.”

The two struck up a correspondence on WhatsApp, and during Yee's trials, Chen took to Facebook and Twitter, tweeting with the hashtag #FreeAmosYee and agitating on forums to get his case in the news. Her campaign helped land him a spot on alt-lite darling Dave Rubin’s YouTube show, where he gave an expletive-laden Skype interview about his predicament while his mother did chores in the background.

It was Chen who suggested Yee come to the United States. While asylum laws can’t magically grant Yee the right to express himself back home, they can allow him to relocate, thereby protecting him from any political persecution that may occur as a result of his statements. At first he was ambivalent, but as his trials dragged on, he made a decision. Chen flew to Singapore to meet him at his home while he was under house arrest in October of last year.

“I admire people who are outspoken, even if they are a bit nuts.”

Chen advised Yee to fly in sooner rather than later, to avoid the uncertainty that comes with any presidential transition. She recalls finding Yee to be the vivacious, cerebral kid she expected from YouTube — with a few significant blind spots: “I asked, ‘How are you going to live? How are you going to make money in the US?’ And it didn’t appear to me that he put thought into it.”

Yee had also been corresponding on Facebook with Nina Paley, an animator and artist in Champaign, Illinois. The pair connected when Yee mentioned her work in one of his videos and exchanged messages over the course of several months, discussing copyright, radical feminism, vegetarianism, relationships, the weather.

“I admire people who are outspoken, even if they are a bit nuts,” Paley told me in July. “I liked what he was doing. It made me a little nervous, but I appreciated he was speaking his mind.” Paley said that if he ever came to visit, he could stay with her then-boyfriend, Theodore Gray.

After Chen coached him through the asylum process, Yee then wrote to Paley to ask if her offer still stood, and whether she thought coming to the US was a good idea. “America is where the action is, isn’t it?” he asked. “I would do research but I honestly don’t know where to do it,” he continued. “There isn’t a Youtuber who recommends which countries to migrate to.”

Paley said she did her best to dissuade him. “Everyone I know who can leave the US is doing so,” Paley warned. “If you end up in jail you will be fucked.” But “if you really want to come to the US, where racism is on the rise and there’s no health care for the non-wealthy, Theo’s offer is genuine,” she added.

“I don’t really know what drove him,” Paley told me in July. “It might’ve been romantic ideas about America. He might have seen YouTube videos and interesting things coming out of the US and thought, This is where you can do stuff and speak your mind. Or maybe it was him just being a kid.”

By December, Yee seemed to have made up his mind about coming, and noted that he was dealing with more legal and political pressure at home to stay quiet: “I really do want to criticize Islam, and Muslims are starting to file police reports. Maybe I’ll head to Illinois early,” he wrote in a message to Paley. “How do I get to Illinois? Is there an Illinois airport?”

Paley now regrets having played a role in Yee’s asylum attempt. “I felt terrible when this happened — I wasn’t encouraging him. I was regarding him as an adult,” she added. “But when I go back and read this stuff again, I’m like, wow, he had no idea.”

On Dec. 14, he boarded a flight to China and, after a 14-hour-layover, one to Chicago.

Yee speaks to reporters in Singapore. Attorneys for the US government are appealing a Chicago immigration judge's decision to grant asylum to Yee. That means Yee will remain in US custody.

Wong Maye-e / AP

Quelle: <a href="This Teen Troll Fled To The US For Political Asylum. Now He's Stuck In A Detention Center“>BuzzFeed

You Can Now Watch Instagram Stories On The Web

You may remember Snapchat Stories?

media.giphy.com

You know, Snapchat Stories. The product Instagram cloned a year ago to create …. Instagram Stories.

giphy.com

Well, Instagram Stories is doing pretty well. More than 250 million people use it, daily.

Guggy.com

That's nearly 80 million more than the 173 million people who use Snapchat every day.

Now, Instagram is bringing Stories to the web. Beginning today, you can view them on a both mobile and desktop browsers. Soon you'll be able to post Stories from the browser too. (Yes, the picture below is Instagram Stories in a mobile browser. What it looks like in desktop is still a mystery.)

Instagram

That's the update. Now go have fun on social media. And don't forget the people that are meaningful in the real, physical world.

Quelle: <a href="You Can Now Watch Instagram Stories On The Web“>BuzzFeed

Apple Will Hold September 12 iPhone Event At New Steve Jobs Theater

Apple on Thursday invited media to its annual fall event, which this year will be held inside the 1,000-seat Steve Jobs Theater at Apple Park, the company's massive new “spaceship” campus.

Sources in position to know tell BuzzFeed News the event will showcase an array of new products, including three new versions of the iPhone, a next-generation Apple TV capable of 4K streaming, and an updated Apple Watch capable of connecting to LTE cellular data networks.

Quelle: <a href="Apple Will Hold September 12 iPhone Event At New Steve Jobs Theater“>BuzzFeed

Here's What Apple CEO Tim Cook Had To Say About Hurricane Harvey

Drew Angerer / Getty Images

Apple CEO TIm Cook addressed the effects of Hurricane Harvey in an email to employees on Wednesday afternoon and said that the company had helped raise more than $3 million for relief efforts.

“Because Texas is home to more than 8,700 of our coworkers, the storm’s impact is felt by all of us,” he wrote in a message obtained by BuzzFeed News, adding that the iPhone maker has a global crisis management team on the ground that is helping to move some employees and their families.

Cook noted that he was in Austin last week, a day before Harvey hit the Texas shore, and asked the employees donate food and supplies at Apple's Austin campus. Apple also allowed customers to donate to the American Red Cross through its App Store, with the company matching employee donations two-for-one. So far Apple users have raised more than $1 million dollars, while the company has pledged $2 million.

Another technology leader, Facebook, took a different approach in soliciting donations from users for Hurricane Harvey, routing donations made through the social networking platform to the Center for Disaster Philanthropy, a lesser-known organization that BuzzFeed News examined on Tuesday. Facebook had previously partnered with the American Red Cross for disaster fundraising efforts.

Cook said he hoped that some of Apple's Houston area stores would be back in operation on Thursday.

“Though our stores in the Houston area are still closed today, we’re working hard to get as many as possible open tomorrow to serve people who have been impacted by the storm,” he wrote. “Our teams are eager to help with problems large and small, and they know there are lots of people in that area who need it.”

Here is Cook's email in its entirety:

Team,

As you know, Hurricane Harvey is having a devastating impact on Texas and Louisiana. Our thoughts are with our employees in the storm zone and the millions of people whose lives have been disrupted by rain, wind and floods. I want to update you on some of the things Apple has been doing to help, and ways that you can get involved.

On the ground, Apple’s global crisis management team is working to support our employees directly affected by the flooding in Texas. The team is in close contact with Apple employees in the Houston area, and they’re actively doing everything they can to assist, including moving some employees and their families to safety. Apple employees in the Houston area have generously been helping people displaced by the flooding by opening their homes to team members and their families, and in some cases, assisting in rescue operations. We’re also proud that the US Coast Guard is using Apple products in those efforts, with nearly two dozen USCG helicopters specially equipped with iPads to help coordinate search and rescue teams.

As Harvey was making landfall, we put in motion critical donation programs. Apple is making it easy for customers to donate directly to the American Red Cross through the App Store, iTunes and apple.com, and we’re matching employee donations two-for-one. Thanks to your generosity and that of our users, Apple has helped raise more than $1 million in just the past few days. That’s in addition to the $2 million Apple pledged to the Red Cross over the weekend.

Though our stores in the Houston area are still closed today, we’re working hard to get as many as possible open tomorrow to serve people who have been impacted by the storm. Our teams are eager to help with problems large and small, and they know there are lots of people in that area who need it.

I was in Austin the day before Harvey came ashore, and the team was already bracing for the storm and the long recovery. Today that work continues. At our Austin campuses, we are kicking off a donation drive in partnership with the Central Texas Food Bank and Caffè Macs to collect food, diapers and personal hygiene items — all things that are critical in the aftermath of a storm of this magnitude.

Because Texas is home to more than 8,700 of our coworkers, the storm’s impact is felt by all of us. There’s still much to do, and Apple is committed to help.

Tim

Quelle: <a href="Here's What Apple CEO Tim Cook Had To Say About Hurricane Harvey“>BuzzFeed

Investor Lawsuit Against Former Uber CEO Sent To Arbitration

Adnan Abidi / Reuters

A Delaware judge on Wednesday told former Uber Technologies chief executive Travis Kalanick and one of the company’s largest investors to hash out their differences behind closed doors, sending a lawsuit against the tech billionaire to arbitration.

Earlier this month, Benchmark — a storied venture capital outfit that has invested in the likes of eBay, Twitter and Snapchat — filed its suit against Kalanick, accusing him of fraud and alleging that he had attempted to interfere with Uber’s search for a new CEO. After Kalanick and Benchmark spent the last few weeks sniping at each other in court filings and elected new CEO Dara Khosrowshahi on Monday, lawyers for both sides appeared in Delaware to argue in front of Judge Samuel Glasscock in the state’s Court of Chancery.

The judge’s decision is a victory for Kalanick, who may now be able to keep the case out of the public eye and avoid depositions. It’s been a horrendous year for the Uber cofounder and former CEO, who was forced to resign in June after employee complaints, press reports and two internal investigations revealed sexual harassment, discrimination and executive misbehavior at the ride-hailing giant.

“Mr. Kalanick is pleased that the court has ruled in his favor today and remains confident that he will prevail in the arbitration process,” a Kalanick spokesperson said in a statement. “Benchmark's false allegations are wholly without merit and have unnecessarily harmed Uber and its shareholders.”

An Uber spokesperson declined to comment. A spokesperson for Benchmark did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

Kalanick still remains on Uber’s board, which also includes Benchmark partner Matt Cohler. The former CEO also currently controls two other unoccupied board seats, which were granted to him in a 2016 decision that Benchmark is disputing in the suit.

In its lawsuit, Benchmark alleged that Kalanick had withheld crucial information about the business from investors while he was CEO and argued that he should be stripped of the board seats granted to him. Benchmark, citing press reports, also claimed that Kalanick was interfering with the company’s CEO selection process in hopes of working his way back into the top job at Uber, which was recently valued by investors at $69 billion. Benchmark’s lawyers had asked the judge to temporarily restrict Kalanick from any business matters, while they proceeded with their lawsuit, which ultimately sought to completely remove Kalanick from the board.

Judge Glascock declined Benchmark’s request and ordered both sides to engage a third-party mediator to sort out their differences. The judge also did not grant Benchmark’s request to freeze Kalanick from current business affairs, though an arbiter could still decide on the issue.

While some Uber executives and investors have distanced themselves from Benchmark’s dispute with Kalanick, others dove head first into the fray. Shervin Pishevar, an early Uber investor and a personal friend of Kalanick’s, wrote several letters to Uber’s board, offered to partially buy out Benchmark’s Uber stake and attempted to intervene in the lawsuit itself when his initial overtures were ignored. On Wednesday morning, Pishevar released a verbose and vociferous statement regarding Benchmark’s lawsuit against Kalanick, which Forbes said he initially penned to inspire Kalanick’s legal team last week.

“Let just cause give pause to those who would ever dream of ever emulating the shameful shenanigans of these sanctimonious hypocrites who fling filings and letters de haut en bas: when it is we who have the higher moral ground and or letters and filings will rain down upon their platforms, exposing them as bitterly barren barons of moral turpitude,” Pishevar wrote.

Meanwhile, at an all-hands meeting held on Wednesday morning, Kalanick and other board members put on a united front to introduce Uber employees to Khosrowshahi for the first time. Kalanick took the stage to a standing ovation and reportedly teared up in his first meeting with employees since he resigned in June.

Khosrowshahi was interviewed by Uber board member Arianna Huffington; the two discussed how to change Uber’s notoriously aggressive work culture, his plans to find a chairman to lead Uber’s divisive board, the possibility of an IPO in the next three years and the leaks that have resulted from clashes between the company’s leaders.

Huffington also asked Khosrowshahi about the possibility that Expedia CFO Mark Okerstrom will follow Khosrowshahi to Uber, which Khosrowshahi reminded her on stage wasn’t public information yet. A spokesperson for Expedia told BuzzFeed News that the company has ”no indication he is leaving Expedia.” Khosrowshahi said his replacement at Expedia could be announced as soon as today.

According to Uber’s communications team’s Twitter account, Khosrowshahi’s first words to Uber’s staff were a blend of praise for Kalanick and promises of better management to come.

“This company has to change,” he said. “What got us here is not what’s going to get us to the next level.”

Quelle: <a href="Investor Lawsuit Against Former Uber CEO Sent To Arbitration“>BuzzFeed