Trump's Election Boosted Demand For Palantir Shares, Investor Says

Palantir CEO Alex Karp at Trump Tower on Wednesday.

Andrew Kelly / Reuters

The market for stock in Palantir Technologies, the Silicon Valley data analysis company that does much of its business with the federal government, was in the doldrums for much of 2016. But since the election of Donald Trump — whose closest tech adviser is Palantir chairman Peter Thiel — demand seems to have picked up, one investor and middleman in that market has told BuzzFeed News.

“Since the election, we’ve seen an uptick in interest in owning Palantir shares,” said Jared Carmel, a managing partner of Manhattan Venture Partners, a boutique investment bank and fund manager that arranges trades in startup shares, and which owns a stake in Palantir.

Palantir&;s elevated stature was on display this week when its CEO, Alex Karp, joined the tech industry&039;s biggest players in a pilgrimage to Trump Tower. Others in the room were top brass from Apple, Google, Microsoft, Amazon, and Facebook — public companies each valued in the hundreds of billions of dollars. Karp&039;s Palantir, which is privately held, has a relatively small valuation of $20 billion.

Given Palantir&039;s roster of customers — which includes the FBI, the CIA, the Defense Intelligence Agency, the Securities and Exchange Commission, Immigration and Customs Enforcement, the military&039;s Special Operations Command and other federal agencies — this face time with Trump and his closes advisors was particularly notable.

Palantir, Carmel said, now appears to be in a strong position to expand its work with the federal government. Trump “is nepotism 101. Any additional contracts that I imagine they could get, they will get.”

For most of 2016, the market for Palantir stock was “dead,” Carmel said. Former employees of Palantir struggled to cash out of the stock options that formed a major part of their pay packages, BuzzFeed News reported in October. Carmel said a BuzzFeed News article in May, which revealed Palantir had lost blue-chip clients and was struggling to stem staff departures, had contributed to the market lull. But things apparently turned around, at least a little bit, in early November.

Investors including hedge funds, family offices, and venture capital funds have recently inquired about buying Palantir shares, Carmel said. Manhattan Venture Partners helps investors buy shares of tech startups that it believes have a good chance of going public soon, and it manages funds that invest in those companies.

Backing off his longtime reluctance to plan for an IPO, Karp said in October that he was “now positioning the company so we could go public. I&039;m not saying we will go public, but it&039;s a possibility.”

A Palantir spokesperson did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

It&039;s not just Manhattan Venture Partners that is getting interest in Palantir stock. This week, in a private Facebook group for Palantir alumni, one former employee said he had learned that EquityZen, a firm that arranges small sales of private company shares, was fielding investor demand for Palantir shares.

“I&039;m sure some of you guys got an email but EquityZen has some investor interest and has asked anyone that would like to sell to fill out their profile with # of shares, desired price, etc,” the former employee wrote. Contacted by BuzzFeed News, EquityZen declined to comment.

“I would post more details,” the former Palantir employee wrote, “but in case there&039;s a BuzzFeed troll (hi William), DM me if you didn&039;t get the email and I can gladly send over.”

Quelle: <a href="Trump&039;s Election Boosted Demand For Palantir Shares, Investor Says“>BuzzFeed

Microsoft: "We Wouldn’t Do Any Work To Build A Registry Of Muslim Americans”

Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella enters Trump Tower

Andrew Kelly / Reuters

In response to questions from BuzzFeed News, Microsoft spokesperson Frank X. Shaw clarified his company&;s position on the use of customer data. “We’ve been clear about our values. We oppose discrimination and we wouldn’t do any work to build a registry of Muslim Americans,” said Shaw.

The company&039;s statement comes a day after its CEO, Satya Nadella, attended a tech summit hosted by President-elect Donald Trump, and at a moment many when tech leaders are under increasing pressure — from both their own employees and the public — to explain how their companies would respond to government requests from the incoming administration, including being asked to build a Muslim registry.

Microsoft initially declined to comment on hypotheticals when BuzzFeed News asked earlier this week, pointing instead to a blog post by Microsoft&039;s president and chief legal officer Brad Smith written the day after the presidential election. The company goes into more details about its principles and policies related to law enforcement and national security requests in its digital trust report.

Facebook also initially would not comment on the record about the Muslim registry, but later told BuzzFeed News: “No one has asked us to build a Muslim registry, and of course we would not do so.” This week employees from Microsoft, Facebook, and other tech companies signed a pledge not to help build a Muslim registry and fight any illegal or unethical data practices.

During his campaign, Trump repeatedly stated that he wanted to build a database of Syrian refugees and made bigoted remarks about Muslims. When asked about a Muslim registry, Trump would not deny that he wanted one, but said his priority was the database of Syrian refugees.

Microsoft has sued the government four times recently to challenge requests for information and Microsoft&039;s ability to be transparent about those requests. One lawsuit challenged a non-disclosure order attached to a National Security Letter. The case resulted in the government withdrawing the letter. In 2013, documents leaked by Edward Snowden showed that Microsoft collaborated with U.S. intelligence service to allow access to communication from users as part of as part of a top-secret program called PRISM.

Yesterday&039;s meeting, which was organized by Trump&039;s billionaire backer, venture capitalist Peter Thiel, and Trump&039;s son-in-law, Jared Kushner, covered jobs, technology&039;s impact on the economy, and possibly repatriation of offshore cash.

Quelle: <a href="Microsoft: "We Wouldn’t Do Any Work To Build A Registry Of Muslim Americans”“>BuzzFeed

24 Of The Best Gadgets You Can Give This Year

All of 2016&;s standout tech, to gift (or get for yourself).

This year, I tried and tested dozens of new gadgets – from high-tech vaporizers to headphones to laptops – and what follows are my absolute favorite products of 2016. Whether you&;re looking for a last-minute stocking stuffer or hoping to splurge on yourself, there should be something in this guide for everyone on your list.

BuzzFeed News

~$50 and under~

~$50 and under~

Well-Kept Screen Cleansing Towelettes ($6 for 15)

Well-Kept Screen Cleansing Towelettes ($6 for 15)

I take a pack of these everywhere. You could try making a DIY screen cleaning spray, but getting a pack of these low lint wipes is easier. They remove oil, makeup, and germs from phones, keyboards, mice, and laptops – or any other surface that can harbor acne-causing bacteria.

sephora.com

Anker PowerCore 10000 ($24)

Anker PowerCore 10000 ($24)

Get this for your friend who always runs out of battery. They will be *so* grateful. This year&039;s portable battery pack from Anker is even smaller and lighter than previous models. It&039;s slightly larger than a credit card (though thicker, obviously) and weighs just six ounces.

The device can hold about three Galaxy S6 and four iPhone 6S charges. Those who need an ultra-high capacity power bank should opt for the PowerCore 20000 ($42), which can hold up to seven iPhone 6S charges.

Anker


View Entire List ›

Quelle: <a href="24 Of The Best Gadgets You Can Give This Year“>BuzzFeed

Inside The Turmoil At Faraday Future, The Startup That Wants To Beat Tesla

Inside The Turmoil At Faraday Future, The Startup That Wants To Beat Tesla

Faraday Future

Next month, Faraday Future, the secretive electric car startup backed by Chinese billionaire Jia Yueting, is set to debut its first production vehicle at the Consumer Electronics Show. It will be a symbolic moment for the company — after all, it was at the same event last year that Faraday was lambasted for unveiling an overhyped concept car — and the hype has been commensurate. Over the past few weeks, Faraday has been aggressively teasing the car with a steady stream of mysterious tweets and short videos of a camouflaged prototype speeding through a desert.

But six former Faraday employees told BuzzFeed News the company is headed toward its big CES reveal following a year fraught with financial troubles, including mounting unpaid bills, lawsuits from a supplier and a landlord, and a distracting side project undertaken at the behest of its largest investor. The past year has also seen a slew of departures, including senior staffers.

“Month to month, the money was never there. Funds were lower than what Faraday needed to cover operational costs and commitments to suppliers,” one former employee with knowledge of the company’s finances told BuzzFeed News. Like most of the people interviewed for this story, the source spoke to BuzzFeed News on the condition of anonymity.

By July, Faraday had added $300 million in debt to its balance sheet as a result of missed payments to suppliers and vendors, according to a company document reviewed by BuzzFeed News. At the same time, it was already more than 30 days overdue on more than $100 million worth of payments to vendors and suppliers, according to a former employee familiar with Faraday’s finances.

A Faraday spokesperson declined to comment on those figures and issues of employee attrition. “As a private company, we do not comment on financial matters. And as a matter of policy, we do not discuss personnel issues or comment on speculation or rumors,” the spokesperson said.

Former Faraday employees with knowledge of the company’s operations told BuzzFeed News its failures to make timely payments led some vendors to cease work on Faraday orders. Some have taken more drastic action.

Last Friday, the auto supplier Futuris filed a lawsuit against it for breach of contract. Futuris, which manufactures and tests seats for Faraday, alleges the company became delinquent on invoices over the summer and now owes Futuris more than $10 million, $7 million of which is more than 30 days overdue. Another lawsuit, filed last week by Beim Maple Properties — a property owner in Torrance, California — claims Faraday has missed $104,950.50 in rent payments for a warehouse. Lawyers for Futuris and Beim Maple Properties did not return requests for comment.

Faraday declined to comment on the lawsuits.

Documents filed by Futuris Automotive in Los Angeles Superior Court

Since its founding in May 2014, Faraday has hired some 1,400 employees, poaching talent from legacy automakers and Silicon Valley stars alike. (A LinkedIn search for Faraday employees who previously worked at Tesla yields more than 130 results; a similar search for Apple returns about 60.) But after two years of operation, it has yet to name a chief executive. Faraday declined to say whether the company is conducting a search for a CEO.

Faraday’s main financier is Jia, founder and chair of a holding company called LeEco, which has been dubbed the “Netflix of China.” Publicly, there’s a lack of clarity around the nature of LeEco’s relationship with Faraday. But according to several former Faraday employees, the electric car startup – incorporated in Gardena, California – operates in practice as a branch of Jia’s Chinese company LeEco, sharing resources.

There is some evidence to support that characterization. In December 2015, employees at Faraday’s headquarters in Gardena, California, received a mandate from Jia: Design a prototype LeEco car that could be shown off publicly at a spring event in Beijing. According to several former employees, some of Faraday’s designers were pulled off of their core projects to work on the vehicle. And in April 2016, LeEco unveiled a sleek, electric sedan called LeSee. On stage, Jia, who has been outspoken about his plans to usurp Tesla, touted LeSee as a LeEco creation as the white sedan glided across the stage to park in a mock garage. The audience couldn&;t see that the seemingly self-driving car was in fact being piloted from backstage via remote control.

Back in California, some Faraday employees were unsettled, sources told BuzzFeed News. Though they’d designed the car for LeEco per Jia’s request, they were not given credit for doing so, and the company didn’t receive payment in exchange. And the development of the LeSee had distracted them from work on Faraday’s own vehicles. “[The LeSee project] certainly added pressure onto the design team. It crunched timelines,” a former employee with knowledge of the project told BuzzFeed News. “It certainly made getting deadlines met that much more difficult.” Faraday declined to comment on the project and the specifics of its relationship with LeEco. LeEco declined to comment on the project as well. In a statement to BuzzFeed News, LeEco said that the two companies are “strategic partners” by “bringing together global resources in several areas.”

“Month to month, the money was never there. Funds were lower than what Faraday needed to cover operational costs and commitments to suppliers.”

Meanwhile, cash wasn’t flowing in from China as rapidly as Faraday had anticipated, putting the company under additional financial strain.

For a number of former Faraday employees — some who left as recently as this fall — the company’s precarious financials became apparent soon after they joined. One former employee who resigned after less than a year said Faraday promised him a specific number of employees to build a team. But after he joined, the company cut that number by more than half. This former employee, an auto industry veteran, became uncomfortable working with Faraday’s vendors because the company so often delayed payments to them. “A car is a big project. You are probably going to purchase thousands of different pieces of parts,” that person said. “In the vehicle industry, you want to keep a very good relationship, a long-term relationship, with vendors. You’re going to be in the market for years.”

At times, Faraday&039;s financial struggles left engineers hanging in the middle of their projects. One former engineer who joined Faraday early in 2016 arrived at work one day to find some of Faraday’s equipment vendors putting orders on hold. The reason: a missed payment. The result: delayed design reviews. Faraday resolved the payment issue, but two months later, this engineer found himself facing the same problem. “We got a phone call from the vendor saying it hadn’t received the payment for a second time, and it had ceased work,” he said. In November, the former engineer said, employees were told some projects would be put on hold for six months until the company received more investment money.

Faraday declined to comment on missed payments to vendors and how they may have affected employees’ work.

The Faraday Future FFZero1 Concept car on display on the first day of the CES 2016 Consumer Electronics Show in Las Vegas.

Robyn Beck / AFP / Getty Images

About 300 miles from Faraday’s headquarters in California, the startup is grappling with another set of troubles.

In April, Faraday broke ground on a $1.3 billion car factory in North Las Vegas. The state of Nevada awarded Faraday $219.5 million in tax incentives as part of an economic development deal for the factory. The 3.4 million-square-foot factory was projected to create 4,500 full-time jobs in Clark County.

But construction on the factory has been stalled since October. In an Oct. 10 letter to Faraday obtained by BuzzFeed News, the construction firm AECOM wrote that the company was $21 million behind on its payments for September and that it would owe an additional $37 million for October and November.

“Faraday is temporarily adjusting their construction schedule with plans to resume in early 2017,” AECOM said in a statement to BuzzFeed News. “We remain fully committed to our client and our employees working on this project, and we look forward to the facility’s successful delivery.”

In September, Jia&039;s LeEco raised $1.08 billion for the LeSee plan, the company confirmed to BuzzFeed News. Then, two months later, Jia, Faraday’s main financier, publicly acknowledged financial difficulties in a letter to employees published by Bloomberg News. “We blindly sped ahead, and our cash demand ballooned,” he wrote. “We got over-extended in our global strategy. At the same time, our capital and resources were in fact limited.” That same month, LeEco said it raised an additional $600 million.

“We asked for numbers about the financing and we just got a different story each time.”&;

Dan Schwartz, Nevada’s state treasurer, told BuzzFeed News that Faraday had agreed earlier this year to biweekly phone calls with the treasurer’s office to offer updates on the project’s financing. He said those calls broke off in mid-November. “We asked for numbers about the financing and we just got a different story each time,” Schwartz told BuzzFeed News. “I truly don’t believe they have any money.”

Steve Hill, director of the Nevada Governor’s Office of Economic Development, took a more temperate position, saying in a statement provided to BuzzFeed News that “the State’s agreement with Faraday anticipated a range of possible outcomes, offering Nevadans new opportunities if Faraday succeeds, while protecting the state in the event it did not.”

With less than three weeks until Faraday’s second CES appearance, just what form its first production vehicle will take is unclear. One former employee with knowledge of the company’s planning said Faraday earlier this year set an internal target to show off about five prototypes at the Las Vegas event. Five former employees who recently left Faraday said the plan to show off a fully polished, driving production vehicle would be a challenge. As it was originally conceived, the futuristic car, tricked out with multiple touchscreens, would cost nearly $200,000, several former employees said.

Meanwhile, Faraday&039;s marketing team appears to be hard at work. On its website, refreshed this week, a clock counts down the minutes to CES as a graphic shows a cloud of particles coming together to form a futuristic-looking car, as if by magic.

A Faraday spokesperson told BuzzFeed News the company is “is creating what we believe to be one of the world’s most technologically advanced, game-changing electric vehicles. We have invested over $600 million in bringing our vision to life, and with a solid team of over 1,000 employees hard at work, we look forward to debuting it at CES 2017.”

If you have information or tips, you can contact this reporter over an encrypted chat service such as Telegram, Signal, or WhatsApp, at 732-615-8367. You can also send an encrypted email to priya.anand@buzzfeed.com using the PGP key found here.

Quelle: <a href="Inside The Turmoil At Faraday Future, The Startup That Wants To Beat Tesla“>BuzzFeed

Facebook Is Turning To Fact Checkers To Fight Fake News

David Ramos / Getty Images

Facebook today announced several initiatives to help reduce the spread of fake news, and a major element involves giving fact checking organizations unprecedented prominence in the News Feed.

The largest social network in the world is partnering with organizations that have signed on to the International Fact-Checking Network fact-checkers’ code of principles to enable them to verify selected links being shared on Facebook and have those fact checks attached to the original link. This is the first time Facebook has given third parties special placement in the News Feed, which is the biggest single referrer of traffic to news websites in the United States, and a huge traffic driver in other parts of the world. This move comes after Facebook faced intense scrutiny for the spread of fake news and misinformation on its platform during the election.

“Symbolically, this is huge,” Alexios Mantzarlis, director of the ICFN, told BuzzFeed News when asked about the significance of this partnership for fact checkers.

He also cautioned that “we&;re going to have to wait and see how the solutions announced by Facebook work in practice and how they are scaled up worldwide to determine what significance this has for fact-checking and the battle against fake news.”

Adam Mosseri, the VP of product management for News Feed, told BuzzFeed News Facebook is not paying the checking organizations for their participation, but said their sites could benefit from the additional traffic that this new level of exposure could bring.

He also said this and the other new initiatives — which involve a tweak to the News Feed ranking algorithm, easier ways for users to report false content, and new ways to prevent scammers from making money from completely fake news — come in response to concerns about the spread of misinformation on Facebook.

Adam Mosseri

Steve Jennings / Getty Images

Facebook is initially focused on attacking “the worst of the worst” of fake news, according to Mosseri. He defined that as “clear hoaxes that are intentionally false and usually spread by spammers for financial gain.”

“Fake news is something we have were looking at before the last month or two, but I would say that the urgency around fake news has definitely increased given the feedback we received from the community,” Mosseri told BuzzFeed News.

How It Works

Here’s how the partnership works and how it will change how some links look in your News Feed: participating partners will have access to a special online queue that will show links Facebook determined may be suitable for a fact check. Links can end up in the queue because users have reported them as false, the viral nature of the link warrants a closer look, the source of the link is “masquerading as a news site,” or for example if a lot of comments say that the story is false or misleading. One or multiple partners can fact check a link.

If checkers rates the content of the link as false, the resulting fact check(s) will be attached to the link in News Feed, thereby alerting users to potential factual issues. So-called “disputed” links will also have their reach adversely affected in News Feed, according to Mosseri.

This is what a disputed piece of content will look like in News Feed:

Facebook

“[The fact checkers] can dispute an article and link to their explanation and then provide context on Facebook so people and the community can decide for themselves whether they want to trust an article or share it,” Mosseri said.

The queue of checkable links is already operational and at least some participating partners have begun submitting their articles to be attached to disputed content.

Concerns Over Bias

Conservatives in the United States have over the years criticised fact checking organizations for having a liberal bias. The owner of a large hyperpartisan conservative Facebook page and website recently told BuzzFeed News that he thinks Facebook as an organization also has a liberal bias.

Mosseri emphasized that this initial partnership is focused on purely fake news, and not on checking claims from politicians or wading into partisan disputes.

“Fake news means a lot of different things to a lot of different people, but we are specifically focused on the worst of the worst — clear intentional hoaxes,” he said.

Aaron Sharockman, the executive director of PolitiFact, told BuzzFeed News that his and other checking sites often face accusations of bias and said they focus on making their work as transparent as possible so readers can make up their own minds.

“I think that at some level you are never going to be able to satisfy certain critics, particularly very partisan ones,” he said. “At PolitiFact we’ve been doing this nine years and have published 13,000 fact checks and we have heard criticism of perceived bias from the left and from the right.”

He said he expected Facebook to take heat for aligning with fact checkers, but credited the company with taking steps to address the spread of fake news.

“They’re sticking their neck out a little bit and I think they’re gonna have to stick it out a little bit more because there are so many falsehoods flowing through Facebook feeds that Facebook is going to be very busy attacking these issues,” he said.

Meanwhile, Mantzarlis expects the partnership will result in a huge increase of applications to sign on to the International Fact Checking Network’s code.

“I imagine that inundated may be an understatement,” he said. “But if this decision by Facebook leads to a surge in genuine fact-checking projects, so much the better.”

In preparation for that deluge, and as a result of the new prominence checking organizations will receive in Facebook, the IFCN is reworking its vetting process.

“We’re now adapting the process to set up a vetting process and ensure compliance,” he said. “Aspiring signatories will have to go through that process. Existing signatories will also be vetted and if they don&039;t meet the criteria, will be delisted.”

He also emphasized that signing onto the IFCN code is just the minimum requirement to be included in the Facebook checking project.

“First, it is important to note that Facebook decides which fact-checkers to include; the IFCN code is just the ‘minimum condition,’” he said in an email.

In response to a follow up question about how organizations will be approved for the third-party fact checking program, a Facebook spokesperson said that participants “must be signatories” of the IFCN code. As of this writing, five US-based organizations have signed on: PolitiFact, FactCheck.org, Snopes, The Washington Post, and ABC News. The latter was only added as a signatory two days ago.

Mantzarlis said ABC News applied early last week. The listing for ABC News on the IFCN page currently goes to a blank page on the ABC News website that is tagged “FactorFake.” ABC News did not respond to a request for comment by publication time.

Quelle: <a href="Facebook Is Turning To Fact Checkers To Fight Fake News“>BuzzFeed

Proposed NYC Law Would Create A Public Database Of Ride-Hail Sexual Assault Reports

Stan Honda / AFP / Getty Images

Today, New York City Council Member Dan Garodnick will introduce a bill to create a public record of all sexual assault and harassment incidents that happen inside vehicles operated by New York City Taxi and Limousine Commission-licensed companies and owners (which include Uber, Lyft, and other ride-hail services).The bill is co-sponsored by Council Member Laurie Cumbo of Brooklyn, who is the chair of the Committee on Women&;s Issues.

The legislation was drafted in response to a BuzzFeed News investigation, which found that in the United States, Uber received five claims of rape and “fewer than” 170 claims of sexual assault directly related to an Uber ride as inbound tickets to its customer service database between December 2012 and August 2015. The investigation was triggered by Uber customer service database screenshots provided to BuzzFeed News; in one screenshot, a search query for “sexual assault” returns 6,160 Uber customer support tickets. A search for “rape” returns 5,827 individual tickets. Other variations of the terms yield similarly high returns: A search for “assaulted” shows 3,524 tickets, while “sexually assaulted” returns 382 results.

The legislation comes as rapes in cabs in New York City are increasing — 14 in 2015 compared with 10 in 2014. Currently, there&039;s no requirement to make information available to the public about sexual assaults in the 143,674 TLC-licensed vehicles in New York City.

“We thought we should take the first step in here to try to combat this problem by measuring it,” Garodnick told BuzzFeed News. “A ride in a taxi should not be an invitation to a sexual assault and real data will allow us to take real action.”

The legislation will propose to collect the assault and harassment information from government entities, including the TLC, 311, and the NYPD. For now, individual taxi and ride-hail companies like Uber and Lyft will not have to report incidents, but Garodnick’s office is hopeful that the bill will expand to include them. The bill calls for the city to collect and aggregate this data annually, and to make the data publicly available and sortable by offense type (rape, verbal harassment, forced touching, to name a few) and vehicle type (for-hire cars like Uber and Lyft, yellow/green taxis, and livery cars).

“By making this information publicly available, it allows policy makers to take steps to clamp down on rape and sexual assault in cars. But it’ll also serve as a benchmark for all the stakeholders in the TLC space to see where they stand when it comes to preventing or being host to sexual harassment and assaults,” Garodnick said.

If passed swiftly, the Council Member’s office said the legislation could be enacted as early as this spring.

Quelle: <a href="Proposed NYC Law Would Create A Public Database Of Ride-Hail Sexual Assault Reports“>BuzzFeed

Twitter Built An Instant Messenger Product But Killed It

Josh Edelson / AFP / Getty Images

Twitter spent more than a year developing an instant messaging app for emerging markets, but killed the product without launching it, BuzzFeed News has learned.

Built at Twitter’s Indian engineering center in Bengaluru, the standalone messaging app — which blended tweets and instant messages in a single interface — was conceived as a sort of new user on-ramp to Twitter proper. But the company killed it in September when it shut down its India engineering center.

Sources familiar with the messaging app’s development told BuzzFeed News that Twitter intended to identify “influencers” around certain topics&;—&x200A;let’s say news or politics or sports&x200A;—&x200A;and encourage them to create groups of interest within the app.

Not only could users chat among themselves in these groups, they could also subscribe them to relevant Twitter accounts whose tweets would be pulled in automatically into these groups — functionality that’s similar to what’s already possible in Slack channels.

“Twitter didn’t have that many active users in India,” one source who worked on the app’s development told BuzzFeed News. “So the idea was that if enough people used the instant messaging app, we could expose a lot of people to tweets without them even going to Twitter in the first place. Eventually, we hoped they would see the value of signing up for Twitter and directly following as many people as they wanted.”

Twitter refused to reveal the number of active users in India, but according to app analytics provider App Annie, the company had around 31 million monthly active users in the country on both Android and iPhone in November 2016.

The reason Twitter focused on instant messaging was simple&x200A;—&x200A;it was a concept that almost all users in emerging markets were already familiar with.

“Look, as a product, Twitter isn’t easy to figure out for most people,” said another source who directly worked on the app and said that none of his peers on Twitter’s engineering team in India were active Twitter users before they joined the company. “Everyone around us was hooked to WhatsApp and Facebook Messenger, and I think internally, there was some concern about how much people were engaging with those platforms versus ours. So instant messaging seemed like a natural choice to build something around.”

A project lead in Twitter’s Bengaluru office oversaw the instant messaging project but checked in frequently with a manager based in San Francisco for feedback, said the source.

The project, however, was ultimately killed since the versions of the app that Twitter tested out with users anonymously didn’t get good feedback. “It didn’t test out so well in the market surveys that we did with college students,” said the source. “And I think that’s one of the reasons why Twitter decided to shelve it.”

The app was killed in September after more than a year of development. Three weeks later, as a part of what Twitter described as a “normal business review” the company laid off its entire Bengaluru staff of 20 including nine software engineers. It also shut down its India engineering center, born out of the company’s $30 million acquisition of Indian startup ZipDial in January last year.

The move came a little more than a month before Twitter announced with its third quarter results that it would lay off 350 people — 9% of its global workforce — to cut costs. According to BuzzFeed News’ sources, even before Twitter made the layoffs official, the company’s focus had moved from user growth to revenue, and non-performing features and experiments&x200A;—&x200A;like the instant messaging app&x200A;—&x200A;were axed first.

Twitter declined comment on the messaging app, but a high-level source at Twitter India confirmed its development and fate. “We took a bet with this product but it didn’t work out,” the source, who requested anonymity, told BuzzFeed News. “After Twitter’s third quarter results, the company focused more on profitability versus growth, and that’s the reason why this app was put on the back-burner.”

“My personal opinion is that if Twitter’s stock hadn’t been falling like a stone, we could have got something else to work on, instead of being laid off like we were,” said another source. “Product testing happens all the time in tech companies and if something doesn’t work, generally, you move to the next iteration or the next thing. You don’t get fired.”

The objective of Twitter’s Indian engineering center was to build products for emerging markets, but multiple sources told BuzzFeed News that the instant messaging app was the only project that Twitter’s Indian engineering team worked on before being laid off.

“We briefly worked on Twitter Lite, a low-bandwidth version of Twitter for slow networks and cheap phones,” said a source. “But it was never released and we don’t know what happened to it.”

It’s worth noting that Twitter added some instant messaging features like read receipts, typing indicators and previews of web links to Direct Messages in the same month it killed off this messaging app.

Twitter’s India operations have been on shaky ground since last month. Less than a week after the company announced its global layoffs at the end of October, its India head, Rishi Jaitley, quit after a four-year stint. Just a couple of days later, Parminder Singh, Twitter’s managing director for Southeast Asia resigned too.

Both Jaitley and Singh came to Twitter from Google. Twitter closed offices in Germany and the Netherlands as part of the October layoffs, but according to Recode, most offices in Asia are still open.

When asked if emerging markets like India aren&;t a priority for Twitter anymore, the high-level source said they wouldn&039;t go as far as to say that.

“However, there is a growing concern within the company that we shouldn&039;t shut down,” they said. “The priority now is to make money. We can revisit this app in the future if we think it&039;s sustainable once again. Let&039;s just say our ambitions have been tempered.”

Quelle: <a href="Twitter Built An Instant Messenger Product But Killed It“>BuzzFeed

Here's A Video Of A Self-Driving Uber Running A Red Light

Here's A Video Of A Self-Driving Uber Running A Red Light

An Uber self-driving car was just caught on camera running a red light in San Francisco. Today was the first day the cars were testing passenger pickup on the open road there.

A YouTube user known as Charles Rotter posted a video of the vehicle as it failed to stop at a red light, and drove through a crosswalk with a person clearly about to cross the street.

Here’s the video:

youtube.com

Here’s where the person who posted the video stops at the red light…

Here's where the person who posted the video stops at the red light...

… and here’s where what appears to be an Uber self-driving car blows right past it.

... and here's where what appears to be an Uber self-driving car blows right past it.

The cars were being tested with people behind the wheel, so it&;s possible that a human, not an algorithm, decided to run this particular red light outside San Francisco&039;s MOMA.

In response to the video, Uber spokesperson Matt Kallman said in an email, “Safety is our top priority. These incidents have been reported and we are looking into what happened.”

Quelle: <a href="Here&039;s A Video Of A Self-Driving Uber Running A Red Light“>BuzzFeed

Ashley Madison Unable To Pay A $17.5 Million Settlement

Carl Court / Getty Images

The owner of AshleyMadison.com will pay a fraction of a $17.5 million settlement reached Wednesday over the hack of the cheating website in July 2015 that led to the release of millions of members&; personal information.

Ruby, which owns Ashley Madison in addition to CougarLife and Established Men, will be required to make an immediate payment of just over $1.6 million divided among 13 states included in the suit and the Federal Trade Commission. But “the remainder of the $17.5 million payment is suspended based on ruby Corp.’s inability to pay,” the New York Attorney General&039;s office said in a statement.

The office told BuzzFeed News settlement figures are not determined by a company&039;s ability to pay but on the violations they committed. “This settlement should send a clear message to all companies doing business online that reckless disregard for data security will not be tolerated,” said Attorney General Eric Schneiderman in a release.

The discussion of Ruby&039;s ability to pay the $17.5 million settlement is not public, and the company&039;s recent financials were not immediately available. In 2014 — before the site was hit by security concerns — the owner of Ashley Madison made $115 million in revenue. If the office discovers the company misrepresented their finances, Ruby would be required to pay the remainder of the $17.5 million.

FTC Chair Edith Ramirez told reporters in a press call on Wednesday that the goal of the settlement was to make the company “feel the pain.”

“We don&039;t want them to profit from unlawful conduct,” she continued. “And at the same time we are not going to seek to put a company out of business.”

The FTC&039;s portion of the settlement will go to the US treasury, and not to consumers, because the $1.6 million figure would not cover compensation for those affected, added Ramirez.

View Video ›

Ashley Madison / Via Facebook: AshleyMadison

An investigation into the hack found AshleyMadison.com had weak security practices, misrepresented its security to users, and failed to delete user information after they paid to be erased from the site, said the New York Attorney General&039;s office.

The site also created fake profiles to lure users who were using Ashley Madison’s free services into purchasing credits to communicate with other members, including “members” with other fake profiles, investigators found. Some of these fake profiles used information and photos from actual users who had been dormant for a year.

Ruby said in a statement that the settlement marks a “pivotal day” for members and the company. But it “neither admits nor denies the allegations made by the FTC and the State Attorneys-General.”

“Today’s settlement closes an important chapter on the company’s past and reinforces our commitment to operating with integrity and to building a new future for our members, our team and our company,” said Ruby CEO Rob Segal, adding the company has been cooperating fully with the FTC for more than a year.

“Our team is making significant, long-term investments in our people, processes and systems to improve Ashley Madison for our members,” he said.

Ruby&039;s president James Millership said the company has already implemented new business practices and improved its security over the last 18 months.

Leaked Emails Suggest Ashley Madison Founder Had Multiple Affairs

That Ashley Madison Hack Just Got Much, Much Bigger

Ashley Madison’s $19 ‘Full Delete’ Option Made The Company Millions

Quelle: <a href="Ashley Madison Unable To Pay A .5 Million Settlement“>BuzzFeed